Abstract
Regulatory peptides are synthesized as part of larger precursors that are subsequently processed into the active substances. After cleavage of the signal peptide, further proteolytic processing occurs predominantly at basic amino acid residues. Rules have been proposed in order to predict which putative proteolytic processing sites are actually used, but these rules have been established for vertebrate peptide precursors and it is unclear whether they are also valid for insects. The aim of this paper is to establish the validity of these rules to predict proteolytic cleavage sites at basic amino acids in insect neuropeptide precursors. Rules describing the cleavage of mono- and dibasic potential processing sites in insect neuropeptide precursors are summarized below. Lys-Arg pairs not followed by an aliphatic or basic amino acid residue are virtually always cleaved in insect regulatory peptide precursors, but cleavages of Lys-Arg pairs followed by either an aliphatic or a basic amino acid residue are ambiguous, as is processing at Arg-Arg pairs. Processing at Arg-Lys pairs has so far not been demonstrated in insects and processing at Lys-Lys pairs appears very rare. Processing at single Arg residues occurs only when there is a basic amino acid residue in position -4, -6, or -8, usually an Arg, but Lys or His residues work also. Although the current number of such sites is too limited to draw definitive conclusions, it seems plausible that cleavage at these sites is inhibited by the presence of aliphatic residues in the +1 position. However, cleavage at single Arg residues is ambiguous. When several potential cleavage sites overlap the one most easily cleaved appears to be processed. It cannot be excluded that some of the rules formulated here will prove less than universal, as only a limited number of cleavage sites have so far been identified. It is likely that, as in vertebrates, ambiguous processing sites exist to allow differential cleavage of the same precursor by different convertases and it seems possible that the precursors of allatostatins and PBAN are differentially cleaved in different cell types. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 43:49–63, 2000. © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.