Abstract

Background Effective psychiatric care requires reliable measurement of patient progress and outcome. The current study aimed to assess the clinical validity of the WHO Wellbeing Index (WHO-5; Bech, P., Gudex, C., Johansen, K.S., 1996. The WHO (Ten) Wellbeing Index: validation in diabetes. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 65, 183–190.) for use as a measure of individual treatment response and outcome in mental health care. Method Three hundred and eighteen consecutive inpatients and day patients at an Australian private psychiatric facility completed the WHO-5, SF-36 and DASS-21 routinely during treatment, and 152 undergraduate students completed the WH0-5. Results The WHO-5 was shown to be a measure with high reliability, validity and sensitivity to change, for use with patients who have affective or neurotic primary diagnoses. Further to this, regression analyses demonstrated that early scores on the measure predicted final outcome. Criteria for clinically significant recovery are also presented. Limitations The results may be generalized to samples with primary diagnoses of affective and anxiety disorders. Assessment of the WHO-5 as a measure of treatment response is warranted in other patient samples. Conclusions The current findings illustrate the potential of the WHO-5 as a quick, reliable and valid means for assessing patient outcome and monitoring patient response to treatment in psychiatric services.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.