Abstract
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy is a powerful tool to study electrode/electrolyte interfaces while they evolve, as measurements can be performed quickly and in-situ, i.e., in the battery cell without need for disassembly. To interpret electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data is however not trivial, as all the diverse processes like electronic resistances, electrolyte ionic resistance, transport limitations within the electrodes, surface film resistances, and the actual charge transfer resistances of both electrodes contribute simultaneously to the EIS spectra. Recently, we developed a three-electrode Swagelok® type T-cell with a gold wire reference electrode (GWRE), which allows for a reliable deconvolution of anode and cathode impedance [1]. Using this GWRE, we were able to isolate the evolution of electrical contact resistance, pore resistance and charge transfer resistance of a lithium nickel manganese spinel (LNMO) cathode during cycling by impedance measurements at non-blocking and blocking conditions [2]. At the latter, the intercalation reaction is thermodynamically hindered, which increases the charge transfer resistance significantly and leads to a shift in its characteristic frequency, facilitating a separation of other impedance contributions. In the present study, we apply the concept of blocking conditions to a graphite anode in LFP/graphite cells equipped with a GWRE. To monitor the SEI evolution during formation, we use a potential stepping procedure, which lowers the potential of the graphite anode gradually with every step down to 0.01 V vs. Li/Li+ and then back up. After each step, the graphite potential is moved back to blocking conditions (2 V vs. Li/Li+), where impedance spectra are acquired. As the charge transfer resistance in blocking conditions appears at very low frequencies, we can unambiguously ascribe an emerging additional resistance in the mid-frequency range to the formation of a growing solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) resistance. The evolution of SEI resistance as a function of potential is now obtained by fitting the recorded spectra to a transmission-line based equivalent circuit model. A comparison of the SEI resistance evolution with the reduction currents obtained by cyclic voltammetry (CV) in different electrolytes (pure LP57 or LP57 + 1 wt% vinylene carbonate (VC), fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) or difluoroethylene carbonate (DiFEC)) confirms that the electrolyte/additive reduction potential coincides with an increase in the SEI resistance (see Figure 1). Lastly, we investigate how the SEI resistance develops during continuous cycling of LFP/graphite cells under different conditions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.