Abstract

Evidence of risk assessment procedures is scarce and inconclusive. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of risk assessment on aggression and the use of coercive interventions in an acute psychiatric admission setting. In addition, we evaluated nurse behaviour before and after the use of risk assessment. To take the fluctuations with regard to aggression and coercive interventions into account, we allowed 26 weeks for baseline measurements, followed by a 26 weeks steady-state period after the implementation of the risk assessment instrument. Contrary to expectations, no positive effects of risk assessment were found on aggression or on coercive interventions. Time spent in seclusion increased significantly with more than 10 hours on average after implementation. Furthermore, there were only negative effects on nurse behaviour and experiences. Among other things, they felt more stressed, spent more time on administration tasks and spent less time with patients after the implementation. In conclusion, there is insufficient evidence to use structured short-term risk assessment to reduce aggression or coercive interventions.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe use of risk assessment tools in inpatient psychiatric settings may help to manage this problem [3, 4]

  • Aggression and violence in psychiatric wards remain a major problem [1, 2]

  • Risk assessment tools are developed to monitor the possibility of aggressive behaviour in individual patients and allow the staff to anticipate problems and make decisions to adjust management strategies and prevent further escalation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The use of risk assessment tools in inpatient psychiatric settings may help to manage this problem [3, 4]. Risk assessment tools are developed to monitor the possibility of aggressive behaviour in individual patients and allow the staff to anticipate problems and make decisions to adjust management strategies and prevent further escalation. One of the main criticisms is that it is useless when no reasonable intervention exists or is available to reduce future harm [5]. It is questionable if the staff will adjust their routines to prevent further escalations on basis of the risk assessment measurements. The ethical dilemma has been raised why to identify highrisk patients and treat them differently when risks are not prevented [5,6,7,8,9]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.