Abstract
AbstractTime‐resolved electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI‐MS) is a powerful tool for interrogating solution‐phase reaction systems. Both mechanistic and kinetic information can be obtained using this technique. The title reaction offers the opportunity to examine the effects of different ionization scenarios with regard to monitoring reactant consumption and product formation. The hydrolysis of isatin was monitored in real time using a variety of ESI schemes: positive ion ([M + H]+, [M + Li]+, [M + Na]+) and negative ion [M − H]−. The utility of each ionization approach, with respect to the spectral features afforded for reaction tracking was examined. A comparison of first‐order hydrolysis kinetics data obtained using negative ion mass spectrometry is made with data acquired via an optical technique. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.