Monitoring of Home Respiratory Polygraphy During Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis Succeeded by LeFort I Osteotomy in Adult Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Abstract

BackgroundBilateral Internal Ramus Distraction (BIRD) is now part of select protocols for treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Introducing a home monitoring protocol offers a valuable alternative to overnight laboratory polysomnography (PSG). PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare OSA parameters obtained via home respiratory polygraphy (HRP) and hospital PSG in a cohort of patients undergoing mandibular distraction (MD) for OSA management. Study designHospital Universitario La Princesa (Madrid) researchers conducted a prospective cohort study with patients diagnosed with moderate (AHI=15-30) to severe (AHI>30) OSA undergoing BIRD followed by LeFort maxillary osteotomy. Exclusion criteria were: severe systemic diseases, central apneas, smoking, poor dental hygiene, or prior OSA interventions. Predictor variableThe predictor variable was PSG and HRP techniques. Main outcome variablesThe main outcome variable comprises a collection of OSA parameters, including the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), oxygen desaturation index (ODI), and time spent below 90% oxygen saturation (T90). These data were measured both before and after distraction, as well as after 6 mm, 9 mm, and 12 mm of mandibular distraction (MD). CovariatesThe covariates were age, sex, cardiovascular risk parameters, and Epworth sleepiness scale. AnalysesPearson’s correlation analyzed AHI, ODI, and T90 values from PSG and HRP. Wilcoxon Signed Rank Sum Test compared two distraction stages, and the Friedman Test evaluated three stages (p<0.05). Multiple regression analysis assessed if covariates were independent risk factors for postoperative persistent OSA. ResultsThe study included 32 patients (25% with moderate and 75% with severe OSA). Final AHI was 10.9±8.9 (events/hour) with HRP, compared to 15.2±13.4 with PSG (r=0.7, p<0.05). ODI was 9.0±8.1 (des/h) with HRP and 8.7±9.5 with PSG (r=0.85, p<0.05). T90 was 1.6±2.2 with HRP and 1.3±3.0 with PSG (r=0.6, p<0.05). Based on HRP data, AHI improved from D1 (34.0±19.5) to D2 (20.8±14.1) and D3 (12.5±10.4) (p<0.05). ODI decreased from D1 (26.1±19.0) to D2 (16.0±12.6) and D3 (9.4±8.8) (p<0.05). T90 reduced from D1 (8.2±12.6) to D2 (4.1±5.2) and D3 (1.9±2.8) (p<0.05). Multiple regression analysis of comorbidities produced non-significant results. ConclusionTo monitor BIRD through HRP has demonstrated efficacy in yielding results that align with PSG.