Monitoring high-dose heparinization during cardiopulmonary bypass – A comparison between prothrombinase-induced clotting time (PiCT) and two chromogenic anti-factor Xa activity assays

Abstract

Heparinization requires monitoring, but optimal methods for measuring the anticoagulant effects of heparin remain to be determined. We compared prothrombinase-induced clotting time (PiCT) and two chromogenic anti-factor Xa activity (anti-Xa) assays in monitoring high-dose heparinization during cardiopulmonary by-pass (CPB). Heparin effects were serially measured with PiCT and two anti-Xa assays in 100 patients. Antithrombin and protein C activities were measured preoperatively, and antithrombin activity was measured during CPB. Activation of coagulation was assessed with measurements of prothrombin fragment F1+2, soluble fibrin complexes, and D-dimer before, during, and after CPB. During CPB mean ranges of PiCT and of anti-Xa heparin levels measured with (anti-Xa A) and without (anti-Xa B) dextran sulfate and antithrombin supplementation were 5.0-5.2, 4.7-5.0, and 4.5-4.9 IU/ml, respectively. There was poor agreement between PiCT and anti-Xa and between the two anti-Xa assays (r = 0.32-0.65 and broad limits of agreement). Patients with low preoperative antithrombin or protein C levels had lower PiCT (p = 0.028 and p = 0.01) and anti-Xa A (both p<0.001) levels during CPB than others. Patients with the lowest heparin activities during CPB (lowest deciles of PiCT and anti-Xa A) had higher subsequent F1+2 after CPB (p = 0.002 and p = 0.02), and patients with high heparin levels required fewer transfusions of packed red blood cells than others. In conclusion, in the challenging setting of CPB there is poor agreement between anti-Xa assays and PiCT. However, coagulation-based PiCT could provide an alternative to the chromogenic anti-Xa assays. Higher heparin levels during CPB were confirmed to associate with reduced transfusion requirements.