Abstract

Background: Conducting evaluations in South Africa has become a common government practice because of the rise in demand for evidence-based policymaking. However, evaluation is often seen as an exercise to be undertaken at the end of a programme – summative – instead of playing a distinct role at all stages of the programme cycle – formative and process evaluation. Subsequently, programmes are often designed without the help of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) specialists to ensure robust and testable theories of change (TOCs) and implementation modalities, or monitoring systems that assess performance to enable adaptive management. Objectives: This article presents findings from a case study regarding what the public sector can learn from formative evaluation to improve public sector programmes. Method: The case study focuses on implementing and utilising the results of a formative evaluation of the ‘You Only Live Once’ (YOLO) programme to highlight frequently experienced limitations and potential solutions to utilise M&E as a form of effective programme management in the public service. It is aimed at the public sector to provide evidence that other forms of evaluation and monitoring systems are critical to enable effective public programming. Results: Key lessons learnt include the significance of developing a clear and comprehensive M&E system at the programme planning and design stage, embedding the culture of M&E in programme implementation, evaluating potential modalities of implementation, rather than simply assuming modality robustness, and capacitation of implementation agencies to internalise and implement M&E requirements. Conclusion: These lessons present the critical role of formative evaluation in ensuring that big-budget public sector programmes are designed and implemented effectively.

Highlights

  • The conduct of evaluations in South Africa, as elsewhere, has become a common government practice as a result of the rise in demand for evidence-based policymaking (Amisi, Marais & Cloete 2018)

  • The programme runs over 12 sessions and is focused on building the resilience, knowledge, skills and values of young people to enable them to withstand pressures that lead to risk-taking behaviours which result in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and teenage pregnancies (DSD 2017)

  • Monitoring and evaluation framework Need for comprehensive monitoring and evaluation framework: The lack of an M&E system deters the application of regular M&E throughout the lifecycle of the programme to enable corrective action to be taken in a timely manner, optimising resources and impact

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The conduct of evaluations in South Africa, as elsewhere, has become a common government practice as a result of the rise in demand for evidence-based policymaking (Amisi, Marais & Cloete 2018). The National Evaluation Policy Framework (NEPF) was adopted in 2011 This framework adopts a utilisation-focused approach, which aims to ensure that evaluations are designed and used for programme improvements and knowledge http://www.aejonline.org. The YOLO programme was implemented in 2017 and 2018 through two modalities: (1) DSD through the South African National AIDS Council (SANAC) and (2) through GCBS. The programme runs over 12 sessions and is focused on building the resilience, knowledge, skills and values of young people to enable them to withstand pressures that lead to risk-taking behaviours which result in HIV infection and teenage pregnancies (DSD 2017). The total number of beneficiaries enrolled has comprised 107 040 children and youth across both modalities of implementation

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.