Abstract
No Abstract.
Highlights
There were no significant differences between right hip (RH)-left hip (LH) for any accelerometer variable (p>0.1) and effect sizes were small (0.02 - 0.15)
Greater variability in monitor placement was apparent for moderate-1 and moderate-2+vigorous variables
The use of accelerometers by researchers to objectively monitor physical activity has seen a dramatic increase since 1997.1 With the greater use of uni-axial accelerometers in large field studies,[2] important questions arise relating to possible sources of measurement error, such as monitor placement.[3,4]
Summary
We investigated the effect of monitor placement on the sources of variance and reliability of objectively measured free-living physical activity (PA)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
