Abstract
The significance of using performance-based monetary rewards in laboratory experiments has been a subject of debate among experimental economists and psychologists. Empirical evidence presented in this paper suggests that payment of performance-based monetary rewards in double oral markets is not a necessary condition for convergence to equilibrium. However, such rewards do increase the reliability or reproductibility of laboratory results and, therefore, constitute a valuable, albeit expensive, research tool.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Paper version not known
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Paper Title
Journal
Date
