Abstract
This paper provides a theory for the joint existence of lending on decentralized money markets (secured or unsecured) and lending by a central bank. There is endogenous adverse selection in the sense that banks choose the quality of their investments, which is private information. When banks need to refinance their investments, the bargaining solution on the unsecured money market eliminates excessive risk-taking, at the cost of terminating some investments that would have been continued under full information. The secured market eliminates excessive risk-taking by forcing borrowers to pledge collateral, at the cost of reducing the scale of productive investments. When there is aggregate liquidity risk, we show that the joint existence of money markets (be it secured or unsecured) and central bank lending improves upon money markets alone. However, without aggregate risk, central bank lending can only make matters worse by reducing market discipline.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.