Money can't buy happiness: A randomized controlled trial of a digital mental health app with versus without financial incentives.

Abstract

Mental health disorders are prevalent among college students and increasing in frequency and severity. However, there is a significant gap between those who need treatment and those who engage in treatment. Given the documented efficacy of financial incentives for promoting health behavior change and engagement in treatment, financial incentives may help, along with nonfinancial behavioral incentives such as motivational messaging, gamification, and loss aversion techniques. We compared brief (28-day) use of two versions of a behavioral economics-inspired digital mental health app, NeuroFlow: (1) the full app including financial incentives and nonfinancial behavioral incentives (treatment group) and (2) a version of the app with nonfinancial behavioral incentives only (control group). In our intent-to-treat analyses, in order to examine the primary outcome of app engagement, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (treatment vs. control) was conducted, and to examine the secondary outcomes (depression, anxiety, emotion dysregulation, and wellbeing), a two-way repeated measures ANOVAs (treatment vs. control × baseline vs. post-trial) were conducted. We found that there were no differences between treatment groups on app engagement or the change in the mental health/wellness outcome measures. There was a main effect of timepoint on symptoms of anxiety and emotion dysregulation, such that there were significantly lower self-reported symptoms at post-trial relative to baseline. Our results suggest that financial incentives in digital mental health apps over and above nonfinancial behavioral incentives do not have an impact on app engagement or mental health/wellness outcomes.