MON-265 Once-Weekly Somapacitan in Japanese Adults with GH Deficiency Was Well Tolerated, with Similar Efficacy to Daily GH: A Randomized Trial

Abstract

Somapacitan is a long-acting, reversible albumin-binding human growth hormone (GH) derivative based on a proven protraction technology. The objective of this trial was to evaluate the safety, efficacy and treatment satisfaction of once-weekly somapacitan compared with daily GH (Norditropin®) over 52 weeks in Japanese patients with adult GH deficiency (AGHD).This was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, active-controlled trial (NCT03075644). Patients previously treated with human GH were randomized 1:3 to either daily GH or somapacitan, respectively, to undergo 20 weeks of dose titration and 32 weeks of fixed-dose treatment. The primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse events (AEs) from baseline to week 53. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline in visceral, subcutaneous and total adipose tissue (VAT, SAT and TAT, respectively) assessed with computerized tomography scans; change from baseline in treatment satisfaction evaluated using Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) scores; and occurrence of anti-somapacitan antibodies.In total, 62 patients were randomized (16 to the daily GH and 46 to the somapacitan treatment arm), of which 60 completed the trial. Baseline characteristics for daily GH vs somapacitan groups, respectively, were: 43.8% vs 47.8% female, 87.5% vs 80.4% adult-onset GH deficiency, mean (SD) age 49.3 (11.5) vs 54.1 (12.1) years, weight 67.9 (12.0) vs 69.4 (22.7) kg, body mass index 24.8 (3.7) vs 26.4 (6.7) kg/m2, and GH dose at screening 0.29 (0.14) vs 0.31 (0.17) mg. Rate of AEs per 100 patient-years was similar between treatment arms (309.8 for daily GH, 312.7 for once-weekly somapacitan); most AEs were mild (97.9% and 93.1%, respectively) and none were severe. Four AEs in the somapacitan arm were serious; all were considered unlikely related to treatment. No anti-somapacitan antibodies were detected during treatment. Mean insulin-like growth factor-I standard deviation score (IGF-I SDS) at baseline was maintained with both treatments. The majority of the patients had IGF-I SDS values below +2. No significant differences in VAT, SAT and TAT were seen in both treatment groups after 52 weeks (estimated difference, somapacitan – daily GH [95% CI]): –1.74 [–18.13; 14.66], –11.53 [–35.54; 12.48], and –12.85 [–47.31; 21.62] cm2, respectively. TSQM-9 scores were not significantly different between treatments, but showed a tendency in favor of somapacitan (estimated difference [95% CI]): 4.87 [–3.46; 13.20] for effectiveness, 6.79 [–1.04; 14.61] for convenience, and 6.88 [–1.08; 14.85] for overall satisfaction.No new safety concerns were identified. Improvements in body composition were similar in the GH and somapacitan cohorts. The safety and tolerability of somapacitan in Japanese patients with AGHD were consistent with results from the global phase 3 trial (REAL 1).