Abstract

We determine the order of magnitude of $\mathbb{E}|\sum _{n\leqslant x}f(n)|^{2q}$ , where $f(n)$ is a Steinhaus or Rademacher random multiplicative function, and $0\leqslant q\leqslant 1$ . In the Steinhaus case, this is equivalent to determining the order of $\lim _{T\rightarrow \infty }\frac{1}{T}\int _{0}^{T}|\sum _{n\leqslant x}n^{-it}|^{2q}\,dt$ . In particular, we find that $\mathbb{E}|\sum _{n\leqslant x}f(n)|\asymp \sqrt{x}/(\log \log x)^{1/4}$ . This proves a conjecture of Helson that one should have better than squareroot cancellation in the first moment and disproves counter-conjectures of various other authors. We deduce some consequences for the distribution and large deviations of $\sum _{n\leqslant x}f(n)$ . The proofs develop a connection between $\mathbb{E}|\sum _{n\leqslant x}f(n)|^{2q}$ and the $q$ th moment of a critical, approximately Gaussian, multiplicative chaos and then establish the required estimates for that. We include some general introductory discussion about critical multiplicative chaos to help readers unfamiliar with that area.

Highlights

  • We show that it suffices to prove a comparable statement for quantities like E| n x,P(n)>√x f (n)|2q, where P(n) denotes the largest prime factor of n. (For the lower bound, this is literally true since if n x,P(n)>√x f (n) is large, with positive conditional probability, the complete sum will be large

  • The model for log ζ (1/2 + it) is very close to log |F(1/2 + it)| in the Steinhaus case, so it is possible that combining (1), Saksman and Webb’s approximation and the results of Duplantier, Rhodes, Sheffield and Vargas [6] about moments of the total measure of critical Gaussian chaos, one could get another proof of Theorem 1 for q bounded away from 1

  • |h( j)| 10 log j, and with Il(s) denoting the increments of the Euler product corresponding to a Steinhaus random multiplicative function, we have j

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The model for log ζ (1/2 + it) is very close to log |F(1/2 + it)| in the Steinhaus case, so it is possible that combining (the rigorous version of) (1), Saksman and Webb’s approximation and the results of Duplantier, Rhodes, Sheffield and Vargas [6] about moments of the total measure of critical Gaussian chaos (which stem from Kahane’s convexity inequality and results of Hu and Shi [17] for branching random walk), one could get another proof of Theorem 1 for q bounded away from 1. The books of Gut [8] and of Montgomery and Vaughan [20] may be consulted as excellent general references for probabilistic and number theoretic background

The reduction to Euler products
Probabilistic calculations
Proofs of the upper bounds in Theorems 1 and 2
Proofs of the lower bounds in Theorems 1 and 2
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call