Abstract

This paper presents a new approach to the spent nuclear fuel (SNF) problem, which is uniquely enabled by a liquid fuel form, specifically as in the case of molten salt reactor (MSR) systems. Managing the SNF problem is critical for public acceptance of nuclear power as a climate change solution. An MSR can be refueled while operating by adding more fresh fuel salt, which grows the in-core fuel salt volume. This growth will eventually double the size of the original fuel salt, allowing to start another core with this excess fuel so long as the daughter reactor is of the same design and there is sufficient excess fuel. This study explores how such a “sourdough” strategy would work in MSRs and provides an initial calculation methodology to find the correct refueling rates to match the desired growth curve of power generation. Higher uranium enrichment levels of the refuel salt result in lower refueling rates and thus a longer doubling time. As a result, the refuel salt uranium enrichment can be tailored to match a postulated clean power generation capacity expansion. This approach allows postponing the spent nuclear fuel disposal issue using the sourdough method. Along with the MSR fuel’s unique properties, it suggests a new path towards managing nuclear waste until long-term solutions become economically viable.

Highlights

  • Climate change is one of the most important issues facing the world today

  • The study concluded that a nuclear expansion would avoid significant proportion of emissions over the century, but the major downside is the increase in nuclear waste

  • This study focuses on determining what enrichment would be needed to meet a projected grid capacity need, assuming no bottlenecks in molten salt reactor (MSR)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Amongst escalating angst over the possible effects of climate change, the nations of the world gathered to form the Paris Agreement in 2016. In this agreement, countries promised to peak greenhouse gas (GHG) production and transition to climate neutral by mid century. The means by which each signatory state achieves this goal is left up to self-determination This has left many to speculate what can and should be used to reduce and even eliminate. One obvious step a state could take towards becoming climate neutral is to increase nuclear power production. Reference [2] explores the effects of increasing nuclear power production tenfold to reduce GHG emissions. The study concluded that a nuclear expansion would avoid significant proportion of emissions over the century, but the major downside is the increase in nuclear waste

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.