Abstract
Researchers investigating historical biogeography rely on taxon cladograms to infer the relationships of different areas of endemism. Unfortunately, systematists are often faced with many equally parsimonious taxon cladograms from a single data set or conflicting phylogenetic hypotheses from independent data sets. We present an analysis of congruence between two con? flicting phylogenetic hypotheses of the poeciliid fish genus Gambusia, one based on mitochondrial DNA sequences and the other based on morphological characters. We explore how different phy? logenetic hypotheses alter interpretations of area relationships and propose a set of area relation? ships for the genus. Furthermore, we compared the area relationships depicted for Gambusia with that of two Middle American fish genera (Xiphophorus and Heterandria) with similar distributional limits. Our analysis revealed areas of congruence among taxa from nuclear Central America but areas of incongruence among taxa from the Panuco basin and North American components. We discuss the implications of our findings in light of conventional hypotheses regarding Caribbean biogeography. This study illustrates the importance of considering alternative phylogenetic hy? potheses fully before attempting to interpret the biogeographic history of a taxon or region. (His? torical biogeography; Caribbean biogeography; phylogeny; Gambusia; Poeciliidae; congruence; area cladograms.)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.