Abstract

Simple SummaryDespite recent advances in surgical techniques and in anticancer drugs, and the adoption of perioperative treatments mostly based on conventional chemotherapy, the prognosis of advanced and metastatic gastric cancer remains poor. In the last decade, the addition of molecular therapy did not show any significant survival advantage, and the first reports available documented an increase of the rate of severe adverse effects and related mortality. We conducted a literature search for randomized trials investigating novel molecular agents as compared to conventional chemotherapy. The outcomes were patients’ survival and the rates of tumor response and of severe adverse effects (SAE). Although we did not find an increase of SAE, the survival benefits of novel molecular therapies available to date for advanced and metastatic gastric cancer were rather unclear, mostly due to inaccurate patient selection, particularly concerning oncogene amplification and copy number.Many phase III trials failed to demonstrate a survival benefit from the addition of molecular therapy to conventional chemotherapy for advanced and metastatic gastric cancer, and only three agents were approved by the FDA. We examined the efficacy and safety of novel drugs recently investigated. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for phase III randomized controlled trials published from January 2016 to December 2020. Patients in the experimental arm received molecular therapy with or without conventional chemotherapy, while those in the control arm had conventional chemotherapy alone. The primary outcomes were overall and progression-free survival. The secondary outcomes were the rate of tumor response, severe adverse effects, and quality of life. Eight studies with a total of 4223 enrolled patients were included. The overall and progression-free survival of molecular and conventional therapy were comparable. Most of these trials did not find a significant difference in tumor response rate and in the number of severe adverse effects and related deaths between the experimental and control arms. The survival benefits of molecular therapies available to date for advanced and metastatic gastric cancer are rather unclear, mostly due to inaccurate patient selection, particularly concerning oncogene amplification and copy number.

Highlights

  • Gastric cancer is one of the most frequent malignancies

  • Trastuzumab was the first MT approved by the FDA and European Union for advanced gastric cancer (AGC); it was subsequently introduced as the standard of care for patients with locally or fAGC displaying HER2 overexpression/amplification [12]

  • CTR armand partially most of these trials did not show any overall and progression free survival advantages as compared to conventional chemotherapy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Gastric cancer is one of the most frequent malignancies. Surgical resection with optimal lymphadenectomy is the only curative treatment in cases of AGC [2,3,4,5,6]. In 2014, Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network paved the way for a new molecular classification of GC and documented the existence of four subtypes: EBV (9%), MSI (22%), CIN (50%), and GS (20%) [11]. The identification of these subtypes and the related signaling pathways provided a roadmap for GC patient stratification and promising strategies for targeted therapies.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call