Abstract

Using molecular dynamics simulations, we investigate the molecular scale origin of crystal face selectivity when one gibbsite particle attaches to another in water. A comparison of the free energy per unit surface area of particle–particle attachment indicates that particle attachment through edge surfaces, where the edge surfaces are either (1 0 0) or (1 1 0) crystal faces, is more energetically favorable compared to attachment between two basal surfaces (i.e., (0 0 1) crystal faces) or between the basal surface of one particle and the edge surface of another. This result suggests that gibbsite crystals with low basal/edge surface area ratio will preferentially attach through edge surfaces, potentially helping the crystals grow laterally. However, for larger gibbsite particles (high basal/edge surface area ratio) the total free energy, not normalized by surface area, of particle attachment through the basal surfaces is lower (more negative) than attachment through the edge surfaces, indicating that larger gibbsite particles will preferentially aggregate through basal surface attachments. The short-range electrostatic interactions including the interparticle hydrogen bonds from surface –OH groups drive particle attachment, and the dominant contribution to the free energy minimum is enthalpic rather than entropic. However, the enthalpy of basal-edge attachment is significantly offset by the entropy leading to a higher free energy (less negative) compared to that of basal-basal attachment. Study of the free energy for a few imperfect attachments of two particles indicates a higher free energy (i.e., less negative, less stable), compared to a perfect attachment

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call