Abstract

Abstract Crystal structures of Pd(I) and Pt(I) dinuclear complexes, [MM′Cl2(μ-Me2Ppy)2] (MM′ = Pd2 (1), PdPt (2), and Pt2 (3)) and [Pd2Cl2(μ-Ph2Ppy)2] (4), were determined by the single crystal X-ray diffraction method. Crystal data and final R values are: 1, triclinic, , a = 10.019(2), b = 10.902(2), c = 9.062(1) Å, α = 97.75(2), β = 102.45(2), γ = 82.64(2)°, V = 952.7(3) Å3, Z = 2, and R = 0.047; 2, monoclinic, P21/n, a = 16.532(2), b = 19.205(3), c = 13.260(2) Å, β = 93.86(2)°, V = 4200(1) Å3, Z = 8, and R = 0.043; 3, monoclinic, P21/n, a = 16.515(5), b = 19.095(10), c = 13.233(4) Å, β = 93.15(3)°, V = 4167(3) Å3, Z = 8, and R = 0.047; 4, monoclinic, C2/c, a = 30.505(4), b = 17.896(2), c = 12.983(1) Å, β = 98.52(1)°, V = 7009(1) Å3, Z = 8, and R = 0.041. All of the complexes were found to be the head-to-tail isomer of a side-by-side type dinuclear structure. The metal–metal bond distances of 2.584(1) Å in 1, 2.561(1) Å in 2, 2.573(1) Å in 3, and 2.594(1) Å in 4 are relatively short compared with those in the analogous dinuclear complexes bridged by diphosphine ligands. All of the M–P, M–N, and M–Cl distances in Me2Ppy complexes become shortened in the order of the Pd2 > PdPt > Pt2 complexes.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.