Abstract

AbstractIt is necessary to understand the molecular composition of fulvic acid (FA), which plays a significant role in the transport and bioavailability of pollutants in the environment. FA collected from Suwannee River in South Georgia (SRFAriver) and Elliott soil in fertile prairie of Illinois (ESFAsoil) are two standard fulvic acid samples of International Humic Substances Society (IHSS). FA collected from Beijing Jiufeng forest soils in China (JFFAsoil) was extracted according to the standard method recommended by IHSS. In this study, the compositions of three FA from two origins (i. e. river and soil) are characterized using negative ion mode electrospray ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (ESI FT‐ICR MS). Compounds possessing higher aromaticity usually contain more nitrogen or sulfur atoms. The aromaticity and humification degree of soil‐derived FA are higher. Soil‐derived FA contains more nitrogen and sulfur elements because compounds containing nitrogen and sulfur atoms are easily absorbed by clay minerals and preserved in aromatic molecules. Comparing the two soil‐derived FA, they differed little in formula and component compositions, but JFFAsoil was slightly more aromatic and less labile than ESFAsoil. These are useful for understanding the difference between the carbon, nitrogen and sulfur element enrichment process in the formation of fulvic acid in river and soil environment at the molecular level.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call