Molecular Signaling Mechanisms at the µ-Opioid Receptor

Abstract

To this day, opioids represent the most effective class of drugs for the treatment of severe pain. On a molecular level, all opioids in use today are agonists at the μ-opioid receptor (μ receptor). The μ receptor is a class A G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). GPCRs are among the biological structures most frequently targeted by pharmaceuticals. They are membrane bound receptors, which confer their signals into the cell primarily by activating a variety of GTPases called G proteins. In the course of the signaling process, the μ receptor will be phosphorylated by GRKs, increasing its affinity for another entity of signaling proteins called β-arrestins (β-arrs). The binding of a β-arr to the activated μ receptor will end the G protein signal and cause the receptor to be internalized into the cell. Past research showed that the μ receptor’s G protein signal puts into effect the desired pain relieving properties of opioid drugs, whereas β-arr recruitment is more often linked to adverse effects like obstipation, tolerance, and respiratory depression. Recent work in academic and industrial research picked up on these findings and looked into the possibility of enhancing G protein signaling while suppressing β-arr recruitment. The conceptual groundwork of such approaches is the phenomenon of biased agonism. It appreciates the fact that different ligands can change the relative contribution of any given pathway to the overall downstream signaling, thus enabling not only receptor-specific but even pathway-specific signaling. This work examined the ability of a variety of common opioid drugs to specifically activate the different signaling pathways and quantify it by means of resonance energy transfer and protein complementation experiments in living cells. Phosphorylation of the activated receptor is a central step in the canonical GPCR signaling process. Therefore, in a second step, expression levels of the phosphorylating GRKs were enhanced in search for possible effects on receptor signaling and ligand bias. In short, detailed pharmacological profiles of 17 opioid ligands were recorded. Comparison with known clinical properties of the compounds showed robust correlation of G protein activation efficacy and analgesic potency. Ligand bias (i.e. significant preference of any path- way over another by a given agonist) was found for a number of opioids in native HEK293 cells overexpressing μ receptor and β-arrs. Furthermore, overexpression of GRK2 was shown to fundamentally change β-arr pharmacodynamics of nearly all opioids. As a consequence, any ligand bias as detected earlier was abolished with GRK2 overexpression, with the exception of buprenorhin. In summary, the following key findings stand out: (1) Common opioid drugs exert biased agonism at the μ receptor to a small extent. (2) Ligand bias is influenced by expression levels of GRK2, which may vary between individuals, target tissues or even over time. (3) One of the opioids, buprenorhin, did not change its signaling properties with the overexpression of GRK2. This might serve as a starting point for the development of new opioids which could lack the ability of β-arr recruitment altogether and thus might help reduce adverse side effects in the treatment of severe pain.