Molecular recognition and modulation of hepatocyte growth factor activity by heparan and dermatan sulfates

Abstract

Introduction Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF) is an unusual growth factor in that it binds both heparan sulfate (HS) (Lyon et al. 1994) and dermatan sulfate (DS) (Lyon et al. 1998) glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) with similar high affinities. Both these GAGs act as co‐receptors for HGF/SF in the activation of the Met receptor (Lyon et al. 2002). Our aim was to determine the sequences in HS and DS that specifically interact with and modulate HGF/SF activity.Materials and methods A structurally unique DS, which possesses O‐sulfation at carbon‐6 of the hexosamine residue (and not carbon‐4 as in mammalian DS), was obtained from the sea cucumber, Ascidia nigra. A variety of HS‐ and DS‐like structures were also generated using various chemical modification procedures (specific desulfations and carboxyl reductions). The ability of these various GAG species to compete with cell surface GAGs for HGF/SF binding was tested using radiolabelled HGF/SF and MDCK cells. The modified GAG structures and the A. nigra DS are currently being tested for their ability to act as co‐receptors for the interaction between HGF/SF and Met by studying cell signalling and cellular response assays, using the sulfated GAG‐deficient CHO‐745 cell line.Results Unexpectedly, A. nigra DS was found to bind HGF/SF strongly with a KD of around 1 nm. This interaction is 20‐fold stronger than that of between HGF/SF and mammalian DS, but similar to that of with HS. A. nigra DS also stimulated HGF/SF‐mediated Erk activation and migration in CHO‐745 cells. Studies using the modified GAG species showed that, in the case of HS, 6‐O‐sulfate and N‐sulfate groups are most important for HGF/SF binding. For HGF/SF binding to DS, hexosamine O‐sulfate is most important. HGF/SF was also found to bind 6‐O‐sulfated GAGs more strongly than 4‐O‐sulfated ones.Discussion The data show that there is flexibility in the structures recognized by HGF/SF, and this explains the ability of the growth factor to bind both HS and DS. However, there are still observable preferences in GAG structure, such as 6‐O‐sulfation over 4‐O‐sulfation. Information on HGF/SF‐binding GAG structures is valuable for the design of HGF/SF antagonists that could be useful therapeutically in the treatment of solid tumours where HGF/SF‐Met activity is up‐regulated.