Abstract

In the present “tree-thinking” period, relying on accurate phylogenetic hypotheses is of paramount importance for biologists interested in an evolutionary perspective. In the Blaberidae cockroaches, a well-defined monophyletic family comprising several model species, no such phylogenetic tree is available despite several earlier contributions. Here, using six molecular markers (12S, 16S, 18S, 28S, COI and COII), we investigate the relationships of Blaberidae and compare our results with the traditional morphology-based classification. This resulted in a broad spectrum of situations, from congruent and well-supported hypotheses (e.g., the monophyly of Blaberidae, Oxyhaloinae and (Geoscapheiinae + Panesthiinae)) to incongruent and weakly supported results (e.g., polyphyly of Perisphaerinae). We emphasize that interesting and contrasted situations lie between the two extremities of this spectrum, especially concerning the genera Thanatophyllum Grandcolas, 1991, Phoetalia Stål, 1874, Laxta Walker, 1868 and Pronauphoeta Shelford, 1909. We also discuss the phylogenetic position of two incertae sedis genera (Eustegasta Gerstaecker, 1883 and Gynopeltis Gerstaecker, 1869). We conclude that in-depth signal analyses should be performed to better understand molecular evolution and its consequence on tree reconstruction for this group. As for phylogenetic relationships per se, new markers should be searched for, especially to decipher deeper relationships in Blaberidae.

Highlights

  • We are presently experiencing what has been called a “tree-thinking biology” era (Grandcolas et al 1994; O’Hara 1997; Baum et al 2005; Gregory 2008; Omland et al 2008; Baum & Smith 2013; LososEuropean Journal of Taxonomy 291: 1–13 (2017)et al 2013)

  • We investigate the phylogenetic relationships in blaberid cockroaches using six molecular markers

  • The best tree from the Maximum Likelihood (ML) combined analysis is shown in Fig. 1 and is very similar to the tree reconstructed in Bayesian Inference

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We are presently experiencing what has been called a “tree-thinking biology” era (Grandcolas et al 1994; O’Hara 1997; Baum et al 2005; Gregory 2008; Omland et al 2008; Baum & Smith 2013; LososEuropean Journal of Taxonomy 291: 1–13 (2017)et al 2013). Myriad phylogenies are produced every year (Parr et al 2012) and these hypotheses serve to investigate diverse evolutionary questions or to revise classifications Even though these numerous hypotheses might be contradictory and bewildering (Chiapella et al 2014), they are essential for present and future studies, especially when they involve model organisms from various disciplines. Blaberid cockroaches comprise model species in research about biomimetics (e.g., Nelson et al 1997), physiology (Li 2007), sociality (Costa 2006; Pellens et al 2007) or reproductive behavior (Roth &Willis 1954; Banerjee et al 2016) These fields of research would benefit from a clear phylogenetic hypothesis or a phylogeny-derived robust classification. Such a phylogeny is still lacking despite several relevant contributions since Saussure (1864) erected the Blaberidae family

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call