Abstract
Geometry optimizations and energy calculations have been performed at the density functional B3LYP level on imidazole (HL), imidazolate (L −), imidazolium (H 2L +), 3-methylimidazole, 4-methylimidazole, 5-methylimidazole, [Zn(HL)] 2+, [Zn(3-MeL)] 2+, [Zn4-Me(HL)] 2+, [Zn5-Me(HL)] 2+, [Zn(OH)] +, [Zn(H 2O)] 2+, [Zn(H 2O) 6] 2+, [Zn(H 2O)(HL)] 2+, [Zn(HL) 2] 2+, [Zn(HL) 3] 2+, [Zn(OH)(HL) 3] + and [Zn(H 2O)(HL) 3] 2+. Coordination of zinc(II) at N(1) of imidazole causes nearly the same changes in bond distances and base inner angles in the imidazole framework as protonation does. The ZnO and ZnN distances in [Zn(H 2O) m (HL) n ] 2 complexes become longer as the number of coordinating ligands increases. Calculated bond dissociation energies show that HL is more strongly bound than H 2O to Zn(II) and its complexes. The population analysis indicates that the imidazole ligand transfers charge to Zn(II) and is a much more efficient charge neutralizer than H 2O. The analysis further indicates that imidazole is very strongly polarized by Zn(II). Intermolecular ZnN stretching and ZnNC bending bands in [Zn(HL)] 2+ are weak in intensity; the former is red-shifted upon coordination of H 2O. The OH stretching frequencies are blue-shifted when imidazole is coordinated to [Zn(H 2O)] 2+.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.