Abstract

Geometry optimizations and energy calculations have been performed at the density functional B3LYP level on imidazole (HL), imidazolate (L −), imidazolium (H 2L +), 3-methylimidazole, 4-methylimidazole, 5-methylimidazole, [Zn(HL)] 2+, [Zn(3-MeL)] 2+, [Zn4-Me(HL)] 2+, [Zn5-Me(HL)] 2+, [Zn(OH)] +, [Zn(H 2O)] 2+, [Zn(H 2O) 6] 2+, [Zn(H 2O)(HL)] 2+, [Zn(HL) 2] 2+, [Zn(HL) 3] 2+, [Zn(OH)(HL) 3] + and [Zn(H 2O)(HL) 3] 2+. Coordination of zinc(II) at N(1) of imidazole causes nearly the same changes in bond distances and base inner angles in the imidazole framework as protonation does. The ZnO and ZnN distances in [Zn(H 2O) m (HL) n ] 2 complexes become longer as the number of coordinating ligands increases. Calculated bond dissociation energies show that HL is more strongly bound than H 2O to Zn(II) and its complexes. The population analysis indicates that the imidazole ligand transfers charge to Zn(II) and is a much more efficient charge neutralizer than H 2O. The analysis further indicates that imidazole is very strongly polarized by Zn(II). Intermolecular ZnN stretching and ZnNC bending bands in [Zn(HL)] 2+ are weak in intensity; the former is red-shifted upon coordination of H 2O. The OH stretching frequencies are blue-shifted when imidazole is coordinated to [Zn(H 2O)] 2+.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.