Abstract

This paper discusses the topic of urban and spatial planning in Italy where decision-making is left almost exclusively to the innumerable, small municipalities present in the country and totaling almost 8000 in number. Projects and actions to transform built areas, infrastructure, and welfare services of all sorts and purposes in a national territory of over 300,000 km2 are supervised by countless mayors, municipal councils, and boards that govern plots of land corresponding to polygons of a few kilometers per side. This is generally achieved by means of town plans developed outside of any general rule or protocol, the contents of which are often ignored as a result of national legislation that weakens them and sometimes makes them uninfluential essentially. This is a European example of urban planning mismanagement that deserves to be brought to the broader attention of the European technical and scientific community, also because the debate developed so far on this topic—even by eminent and authoritative urban planners—has been published almost entirely in Italian only. Public and political attention towards this issue is extremely limited, although the severe effects of “molecular planning” are beginning to be perceived: unjustified overurbanization and highly patchy, energy-intensive, urban patterns that are destructive for ecosystems and at odds with public interests regarding environmental and urban quality. In this paper, we make some comparisons with other European countries and outline some directions—certainly very difficult to follow—to reconsider and recover from the adverse effects produced to date.

Highlights

  • This paper analyzes the phenomenon of the virtually utmost autonomy that Italian municipalities enjoy in the management of urban and spatial planning, without being subject to almost any higher strategic supervision, highlighting some of the most glaring and negative consequences and putting forward a course for at least partial recovery

  • This condition has gradually worsened amid generalized indifference in the course of some decades, but its pathological aspects have been seized only recently: unjustified overurbanization and highly patchy, energy-intensive, urban patterns that are destructive for ecosystems and at odds with public interests regarding environmental and urban quality

  • It is certainly true that the Italian urban planning law dated 1942 (Law no. 1150 dated 17 August 1942,) was one of the first and most innovative, as it introduced multi-level planning and urban development plans extended to entire municipal territories and limited the building activities of municipalities lacking urban development plans

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper analyzes the phenomenon of the virtually utmost autonomy that Italian municipalities enjoy in the management of urban and spatial planning, without being subject to almost any higher strategic supervision, highlighting some of the most glaring and negative consequences and putting forward a course for at least partial recovery. This condition has gradually worsened amid generalized indifference in the course of some decades, but its pathological aspects have been seized only recently: unjustified overurbanization and highly patchy, energy-intensive, urban patterns that are destructive for ecosystems and at odds with public interests regarding environmental and urban quality. Very intensive over time, this activity has been marked by significant inhomogeneity and once again weak strategic regulatory capabilities, gradually easing existing forms of supervision and leaving decision-making more and more to municipalities, small and demographically irrelevant they may be [1,2,3,4]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call