Abstract
The radioactive decay of 40K to 40Ar is the basis of isotope age determination of micaceous clay minerals formed during diagenesis. The difference in K–Ar ages between fine and coarse grained illite particles has been interpreted using detrital-authigenic components system, its crystallization history or post-crystallization diffusion. Yet another mechanism should also be considered: natural 40Ar recoil. Whether this recoil mechanism can result in a significant enough loss of 40Ar to provide observable decrease of K–Ar age of the finest illite crystallites at diagenetic temperatures – is the primary objective of this study which is based on molecular dynamics (MD) computer simulations.All the simulations were performed for the same kinetic energy (initial velocity) of the 40Ar atom, but for varying recoil angles that cover the entire range of their possible values. The results show that 40Ar recoil can lead to various deformations of the illite structure, often accompanied by the displacement of OH groups or breaking of the Si–O bonds. Depending on the recoil angle, there are four possible final positions of the 40Ar atom with respect to the 2:1 layer at the end of the simulation: it can remain in the interlayer space or end up in the closest tetrahedral, octahedral or the opposite tetrahedral sheet. No simulation angles were found for which the 40Ar atom after recoil passes completely through the 2:1 layer. The energy barrier for 40Ar passing through the hexagonal cavity from the tetrahedral sheet into the interlayer was calculated to be 17kcal/mol. This reaction is strongly exothermic, therefore there is almost no possibility for 40Ar to remain in the tetrahedral sheet of the 2:1 layer over geological time periods. It will either leave the crystal, if close enough to the edge, or return to the interlayer space. On the other hand, if 40Ar ends up in the octahedral sheet after recoil, a substantially higher energy barrier of 55kcal/mol prevents it from leaving the TOT layer over geological time.Based on the results of MD simulations, the estimates of the potential effect of 40Ar recoil on the K–Ar dating of illite show that some of 40Ar is lost and the loss is substantially dependent on the crystallite dimensions. The 40Ar loss can vary from 10% for the finest crystallites (two 2:1 layers thickness and <0.02μm in diameter) to close to zero for the thickest and largest (in the ab plane) ones. Because the decrease of the K–Ar estimated age is approximately proportional to the 40Ar loss, the finer crystallites show lower apparent age than the coarser ones, although the age of crystallization is assumed equal for all the crystallites. From the model it is also clear that the lack of K removal from illite fringes (potentially Ar-free) strongly increases the apparent age differences among crystallites of different size.
Highlights
The radioactive decay of 40K to 40Ar is the basis of the isotope age determination of micaceous clay minerals: illite, glauconite, aluminoceladonite, sericite, and their mixed-layered interstratifications with smectite
Its structure is typical for a 2:1 layer silicate: an octahedral Al-dominated sheet (O) sandwiched between two tetrahedral sheets (T), where SiO44À tetrahedra are partially substituted by AlO45À and the excess of negative charge is compensated by the presence of potassium cations in the interlayer
The radiogenic 40Ar retention in the structure is attributed exclusively to the electrostatic cohesion forces between the adjacent negatively charged TOT layers mediated by the positively charged interlayer K+ cations, OH group orientation, and the interlayer ionic porosity
Summary
The radioactive decay of 40K to 40Ar is the basis of the isotope age determination of micaceous clay minerals: illite, glauconite, aluminoceladonite, sericite (fine variety of muscovite), and their mixed-layered interstratifications with smectite. These dating methods are based on the assumption that the mineral of interest remained a closed system since crystallization (e.g., Clauer et al, 1997). The radiogenic 40Ar retention in the structure is attributed exclusively to the electrostatic cohesion forces between the adjacent negatively charged TOT layers mediated by the positively charged interlayer K+ cations, OH group orientation, and the interlayer ionic porosity (interlayer unit-cell volume not occupied by cations; Dahl, 1996)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.