Abstract

BackgroundPhiladelphia chromosome-positive acute myeloid leukemia (Ph+ AML) is a provisional disease entity in the 2016 WHO classification, while its genetic profile of Ph+ AML remains poorly defined. In addition, the differentiating features of Ph+ AML and chronic myeloid leukemia in myeloid blast crisis (CML-MBC) remain controversial. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of 15 Ph+ AML patients to compare their clinical and laboratory profiles with 27 CML-MBC patients. ResultsCompared to CML-MBC, Ph+ AML patients presented with significantly higher peripheral WBC count and bone marrow blast percentage. The immunophenotypic profiles were largely similar between Ph+ AML and CML-MBC, except for CD4 expression, which was significantly enriched in CML-MBC. Ph+ AML patients less frequently harboured co-occurring additional cytogenetic abnormalities (ACA) compared to CML-MBC, and trisomy 19 (23%) and IDH1/2 (46%) were the most common ACA and mutated genes in Ph+ AML, respectively. Overall survival (OS) did not significantly differ between Ph+ AML and CML-MBC. Ph+ AML without CML-like features appeared to have a better outcome compared to Ph+ AML with CML-like features; ACA in Ph+ AML may confer an even worse prognosis. ConclusionsOur results indicate that patients with Ph+ AML share similar genetic profiles and clinical outcomes with those with CML-MBC, thus should be classified as a high-risk entity.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call