Molecular evolution of Cinetochilum and Sathrophilus (Protozoa, Ciliophora, Oligohymenophorea), two genera of ciliates with morphological affinities to scuticociliates

Abstract

Zhang, Q., Miao, M., Strüder‐Kypke, M. C., Al‐Rasheid, K. A. S., Al‐Farraj, S. A. & Song, W. (2011). Molecular evolution of Cinetochilum and Sathrophilus (Protozoa, Ciliophora, Oligohymenophorea), two genera of ciliates with morphological affinities to scuticociliates. —Zoologica Scripta, 40, 317–325.The ciliate order Loxocephalida sensu Li et al. (2006) has been considered to be systematically uncertain within the subclass Scuticociliatia. Loxocephalids display mixed morphological features and morphogenetic patterns that are found in two different oligohymenophorean subclasses: scuticociliates and hymenostomes. To reveal their phylogenetic positions, molecular information on this group is urgently needed but still inadequate. In the present study, we have sequenced the small subunit rRNA gene of two newly described loxocephalids, Cinetochilum ovale Gong & Song 2008; and Sathrophilus planus Fan et al. 2010; which have never been discussed based on molecular analysis. Results show: (i) all phylogenetic trees are nearly identical in placing Cinetochilum closest to the subclass Apostomatia and form a monophyletic group divergent from the typical scuticociliates, (ii) the genus Sathrophilus, together with Anoplophrya, a poorly known Astomatia, forms a peripheral branch separated from the scuticociliatian assemblage and (iii) the affiliation of the loxocephalid genera sensu Li et al. (2006) is not confirmed due to a dispersion in four deeply diverged clades. In addition, the polyphyly of the genus Cyclidium, shown in previous studies, is confirmed by our phylogenetic analyses and supported by the approximately unbiased test based on the new database in this work.