Abstract

In vertebrates, sex determination occurs along a continuum from strictly genotypic (GSD), where sex is entirely guided by genes, to strictly environmental (ESD), where rearing conditions, like temperature, determine phenotypic sex. Along this continuum are taxa which have combined genetic and environmental contributions to sex determination (GSD + EE), where some individuals experience environmental effects which cause them to sex reverse and develop their phenotypic sex opposite their genotypic sex. Amphibians are often assumed to be strictly GSD with sex reversal typically considered abnormal. Despite calls to understand the relative natural and anthropogenic causes of amphibian sex reversal, sex reversal has not been closely studied across populations of any wild amphibian, particularly in contrasting environmental conditions. Here, we use sex-linked molecular markers to discover sex reversal in wild populations of green frogs (Rana clamitans) inhabiting ponds in either undeveloped, forested landscapes or in suburban neighborhoods. Our work here begins to suggest that sex reversal may be common within and across green frog populations, occurring in 12 of 16 populations and with frequencies of 2–16% of individuals sampled within populations. Additionally, our results also suggest that intersex phenotypic males and sex reversal are not correlated with each other and are also not correlated with suburban land use. While sex reversal and intersex are often considered aberrant responses to human activities and associated pollution, we found no such associations here. Our data perhaps begin to suggest that, relative to what is often suggested, sex reversal may be a relatively natural process in amphibians. Future research should focus on assessing interactions between genes and the environment to understand the molecular and exogenous basis of sex determination in green frogs and in other amphibians.

Highlights

  • Sex-determining (SD) modes occur along a continuum bounded by genotypic sex determination (GSD), where phenotypic sex is entirely controlled by genes on sex

  • We previously found that intersex green frogs commonly occur in suburban ponds (Smits, Skelly & Bolden, 2014) and that metamorphosing froglet phenotypic sex ratios vary along a forest-to-suburban land use gradient and are most skewed in forests (Lambert et al, 2015)

  • By inferring sex reversal in green frogs living in different anthropogenic and undeveloped ecological contexts, we provide early support that sex reversal might be a relatively natural and frequent process in this species

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sex-determining (SD) modes occur along a continuum bounded by genotypic sex determination (GSD), where phenotypic sex is entirely controlled by genes on sexHow to cite this article Lambert MR, Tran T, Kilian A, Ezaz T, Skelly DK. 2019. Modes along this continuum combine GSD and environmental effects (EE) where some individuals are genetically-predisposed to develop as a given sex and can undergo environmentallymediated sex reversal and develop their phenotypic sex opposite their genotypic sex (termed GSD + EE in Valenzuela, Adams & Janzen, 2003; Valenzuela et al, 2014; Grossen, Neuenschwander & Perrin, 2011). Fish and non-avian reptiles show repeated transitions between GSD, ESD, and GSD + EE whereas GSD is the rule in both mammals and birds (Sarre, Georges & Quinn, 2004; Sarre, Ezaz & Georges, 2011; Bachtrog et al, 2014; Capel, 2017)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call