Abstract
Shannon’s theory of communication has been very successfully applied for the analysis of biological information. However, the theory neglects semantic and pragmatic aspects and thus cannot directly be applied to distinguish between (bio-) chemical systems able to process “meaningful” information from those that do not. Here, we present a formal method to assess a system’s semantic capacity by analyzing a reaction network’s capability to implement molecular codes. We analyzed models of chemical systems (martian atmosphere chemistry and various combustion chemistries), biochemical systems (gene expression, gene translation, and phosphorylation signaling cascades), an artificial chemistry, and random reaction networks. Our study suggests that different chemical systems posses different semantic capacities. No semantic capacity was found in the model of the martian atmosphere chemistry, the studied combustion chemistries, and highly connected random networks, i.e. with these chemistries molecular codes cannot be implemented. High semantic capacity was found in the studied biochemical systems and in random reaction networks where the number of second order reactions is twice the number of species. We conclude that our approach can be applied to evaluate the information processing capabilities of a chemical system and may thus be a useful tool to understand the origin and evolution of meaningful information, e.g. in the context of the origin of life.
Highlights
In recent years great advances have been made in understanding the biochemical basis of biological information processing
We have introduced a formal criterion for identifying molecular codes in reaction networks and a measure of the semantic capacity of a network, as the number of different code pairs the network can realize
Applying the new concepts to different networks, our basic finding demonstrates that the semantic capacity of biological networks tends to be higher than the semantic capacity of the studied non-biological networks
Summary
In recent years great advances have been made in understanding the biochemical basis of biological information processing. In order to obtain a full understanding of biological information, studying semantic as well as pragmatic aspects would be important, if not necessary [6,7]. Semantics refers to the relation between a sign and its meaning This relation can be characterized by a code, which is a mapping from the signs to their meanings [9]. An important property of a code is its contingency This means that the relation between signs and meanings could be different, the relation is not determined by the signs and meanings alone [6,9]. This implies that natural laws allow to derive the relation only by knowing the context under which the signs are interpreted
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.