Abstract

Tick‐borne anaplasmosis and ehrlichiosis are clinically important emerging zoonoses usually overlooked by veterinarians and physicians alike. This study aimed at detecting and genetically characterizing Ehrlichia and Anaplasma species in ixodid ticks and their animal hosts from the West Bank, Palestine. A total of 723 ixodid ticks belonging to three genera (Rhipicephalus, Hyalomma, Haemaphysalis) were collected from dogs, sheep, goats and camels. In addition, 189 blood samples were collected from dogs, sheep, camels, horses and a goat from the West Bank, Palestine. All tick and blood samples were investigated for the presence of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia targeting a 345 bp fragment of the 16S rRNA gene followed by sequence analysis. The infection rate of Anaplasma spp. in ticks was 6.5% (47/723). Anaplasma platys was identified in 28% (13/47) of them. Whereas, based on a partial sequence (851 bp) of msp4 gene, 38% (18/47) were identified as A. ovis. The species of the remaining 16 positive samples (16/47, 34%) could not be identified. Simultaneously, the infection rate of Ehrlichia spp. in the ticks was 0.6% (4/723). Three of which were E. canis and one was Ehrlichia spp. The infection rate of A. platys in dogs’ blood samples was 10% (13/135), while it was 1.5% (2/135) for E. canis. The infection rate of Anaplasma in sheep blood samples was 40% (19/47), out of which 26% (5/19) were caused by A. ovis as revealed by msp4‐PCR. Implementation of purely‐spatial analysis by saTScan for all cases of Anaplasma revealed two statistically significant clusters in two districts; Tubas town and Majdal‐Bani‐Fadil village on the western hills of the Jordan Valley. Most cases of Anaplasma (83%) were from rural areas where life cycle components (vector, host and reservoir) abundantly interact. This study is the first in Palestine to reveal the presence of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia in ticks, dogs and sheep providing crucial platform for future epidemiological surveys and control strategies in the country and region.

Highlights

  • In Palestine and elsewhere in the world, ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis are considered neglected tickborne bacterial zoonoses caused by Ehrlichia and Anaplasma

  • The 13 A. platys were detected in R. turanicus (n = 8) and R. sanguineus (n = 5)

  • Three DNA sequences obtained from R. sanguineus s.l. were identified as E. canis, whereas one sequence from H. parva belonged to Ehrlichia spp

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In Palestine and elsewhere in the world, ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis are considered neglected tickborne bacterial zoonoses caused by Ehrlichia and Anaplasma. The two genera belonging to the family Anaplasmataceae encompass groups of obligatory intracellular Gram-negative bacteria invading blood cells of mammals including leukocytes, erythrocytes and thrombocytes (Yang et al 2015). The reservoir hosts include numerous wild and domesticated animals (Dumler et al 2001; Ismail et al 2010). Hard ticks from the Ixodidae family usually transmit these pathogens to mammals; in addition, they can be transmitted directly to both human and animals by blood transfusion (Fine et al 2016; Marenzoni et al 2017). The genus Ehrlichia contains six recognized species: Ehrlichia canis, E. chaffeensis, E. ewingii, E. muris, E. ruminantium and E. minasensis (Cabezas-Cruz et al 2016). The currently recognized six species in the genus Anaplasma are Anaplasma phagocytophilum which cause human granulocytic anaplasmosis (HGA), A. platys, A. marginale, A. bovis, A. ovis, A. capra and A. odocoilei

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call