Abstract

A series of pentamethylcyclopentadienyl-substituted bismuth halo complexes were prepared by the reactions of bismuth(III) halides BiX3 (X = Cl, Br, I) with LiCp* (Cp* = C5Me5) in 1:1 ratio. The crystal structures of [Cp*5Bi6Cl12][(thf)2Bi2Cl7] (1), [Cp*BiBr2]∞ (2), [{Cp*5Bi5Br9}{BiBr4}]2 (3), and [Cp*BiI2]∞ (4) were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. 1–4 display different types of aggregation, polymeric association, and Cp*–BiX2 bond hapticity depending on the halogen atom at Bi. The cationic portion of 1 is a distorted octahedral Bi6 cage that shows no Bi–Bi bonding, is capped by halo ligands and Cp* rings in a η5-fashion, and contains an interstitial Cl atom. The main structural difference in the bismuth halide framework between cationic portions {Cp*5Bi5Br9}+ in 3 and [Cp*5Bi6Cl12]+ in 1 is a neutral BiX3 unit complexed to the [{Cp*5Bi5Cl9}]+ fragment of the latter. 2 and 4 are zigzag polymers with different types of intermolecular interaction in the crystals. More ionic Cp*–Bi bonding results in higher hapticity and appears to favor cage formation, while more covalent bonding favors lower hapticity. According to quantum chemical calculations on the simplified gas phase models Cp*BiX2 (X = F, Cl, Br, I), the Cp* ring is attached via a η1(π)-bonding mode. The structural diversity of the observed assemblies is driven by the nature of Cp*–Bi bonding, which was examined by NBO analysis.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.