Abstract

Elucidating the phylogenetic relationships of the current but problematic Dasyatidae (Order Myliobatiformes) was the first priority of the current study. Here, we studied three molecular gene markers of 43 species (COI gene), 33 species (ND2 gene) and 34 species (RAG1 gene) of stingrays to draft out the phylogenetic tree of the order. Nine character states were identified and used to confirm the molecularly constructed phylogenetic trees. Eight or more clades (at different hierarchical level) were identified for COI, ND2 and RAG1 genes in the Myliobatiformes including four clades containing members of the present Dasyatidae, thus rendering the latter non-monophyletic. The uncorrected p-distance between these four ‘Dasytidae’ clades when compared to the distance between formally known families confirmed that these four clades should be elevated to four separate families. We suggest a revision of the present classification, retaining the Dasyatidae (Dasyatis and Taeniurops species) but adding three new families namely, Neotrygonidae (Neotrygon and Taeniura species), Himanturidae (Himantura species) and Pastinachidae (Pastinachus species). Our result indicated the need to further review the classification of Dasyatis microps. By resolving the non-monophyletic problem, the suite of nine character states enables the natural classification of the Myliobatiformes into at least thirteen families based on morphology.

Highlights

  • The family Dasyatidae in the Order Myliobatiformes is one of the biggest families of batoid fishes

  • A total of 47 tissue samples belonging to 5 families and 22 species of stingrays were used for the Cytochrome Oxidase I (COI) analysis

  • As for Recombination Activating Gene 1 (RAG1) gene, the phylogenetic analysis was based on NCBI Genbank sequences of 34 species of stingrays within the Order Myliobatiformes (Fig 3)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The family Dasyatidae in the Order Myliobatiformes is one of the biggest families of batoid fishes. Molecular and Morphological Analyses of Family Dasyatidae external morphological structures, squamation, tooth root vascularization and structure, lateral line canal, skeletal structure and cephalic and branchial musculature [2], or molecular markers including mtGenome, RAG1 and SCFD2 [3, 4]. These approaches fail to classify the Dasyatidae such as the species of Himantura and Pastinachus into defined clusters since some still remain as incertae sedis or uncertain placements. Some distinct characters such as the ventral tail fold and body and tail pigmentations, not included in McEachran & Aschliman [2], may be used to resolve the taxonomic uncertainties between Himantura and Pastinachus [5]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call