Abstract

Hallucinogens are a loosely defined group of compounds including LSD, N,N-dimethyltryptamines, mescaline, psilocybin/psilocin, and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methamphetamine (DOM), which can evoke intense visual and emotional experiences. We are witnessing a renaissance of research interest in hallucinogens, driven by increasing awareness of their psychotherapeutic potential. As such, we now present a narrative review of the literature on hallucinogen binding in vitro and ex vivo, and the various molecular imaging studies with positron emission tomography (PET) or single photon emission computer tomography (SPECT). In general, molecular imaging can depict the uptake and binding distribution of labelled hallucinogenic compounds or their congeners in the brain, as was shown in an early PET study with N1-([11C]-methyl)-2-bromo-LSD ([11C]-MBL); displacement with the non-radioactive competitor ketanserin confirmed that the majority of [11C]-MBL specific binding was to serotonin 5-HT2A receptors. However, interactions at serotonin 5HT1A and other classes of receptors and pleotropic effects on second messenger pathways may contribute to the particular experiential phenomenologies of LSD and other hallucinogenic compounds. Other salient aspects of hallucinogen action include permeability to the blood–brain barrier, the rates of metabolism and elimination, and the formation of active metabolites. Despite the maturation of radiochemistry and molecular imaging in recent years, there has been only a handful of PET or SPECT studies of radiolabeled hallucinogens, most recently using the 5-HT2A/2C agonist N-(2[11CH3O]-methoxybenzyl)-2,5-dimethoxy- 4-bromophenethylamine ([11C]Cimbi-36). In addition to PET studies of target engagement at neuroreceptors and transporters, there is a small number of studies on the effects of hallucinogenic compounds on cerebral perfusion ([15O]-water) or metabolism ([18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose/FDG). There remains considerable scope for basic imaging research on the sites of interaction of hallucinogens and their cerebrometabolic effects; we expect that hybrid imaging with PET in conjunction with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) should provide especially useful for the next phase of this research.

Highlights

  • The sites of hallucinogen binding and action in the central nervous system are amenable to study by molecular imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) or single photon emission computer tomography (SPECT), and can be studied by functional magnetic resonance imaging of cerebral perfusion and connectivity [1]

  • A prohibition against hallucinogen research established in many countries the 1970s was until recently an impediment to progress in our understanding of the phenomenology and physiology of hallucinogen action [2,3]; PubMed hits for the search term “hallucinogen” peaked in 1974, troughed around 1990, and have sustained a high level since 2010

  • We present a narrative review of the present state of the molecular imaging literature on hallucinogenic molecules

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Diverse ergolines, phenylethylamines, and tryptamines known collectively as hallucinogens induce perceptual and affective changes, extending from sensory distortions (illusions) to sensing of non-existent objects (hallucinations), with varying degree of control over or insight into the altered state. Agonists of 5HT1A sites such as 8-hydroxy-DPAT have no intrinsic effect on cyclic AMP (cAMP) production in rat hippocampal neurons, but inhibit the stimulation of adenylyl cyclase provoked by other receptor types [26], suggesting receptor coupling to second messenger systems via Gi/o-type G-proteins In another assay system, the increased retention of [35S]-guanosine-. The 5HT2A receptor forms a functional heterodimer with the mGluR2 receptor, which evokes allosteric effects on serotonin agonist binding [34]; this interaction reduces the hallucinogen-specific Gi/o protein signaling and behavior and may account for the lack of hallucinogenic action of 2-bromo-LSD (5) noted above. In vitro binding competition studies indicated that LSD (1) and other hallucinogens possess some affinity for TAAR1 [9]

Affinities of LSD at Neuroreceptors In Vitro
Affinities of Hallucinogenic Phenylethylamines In Vitro
Affinities of Hallucinogenic Tryptamines In Vitro
The Strange Case of Ibogaine
Phenylethylamine Derivatives
Tryptamine Derivatives
Competition from Hallucinogens at Dopamine Receptors In Vivo
Competition from Hallucinogens at Serotonin Receptors In Vivo
Tryptamimes
Findings
Ayahuasca and Pharmahuasca
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call