Abstract

The lemurs of Madagascar include numerous species characterized by folivory across several families. Many extant lemuriform folivores exist in sympatry in Madagascar’s remaining forests. These species avoid feeding competition by adopting different dietary strategies within folivory, reflected in behavioral, morphological, and microbiota diversity across species. These conditions make lemurs an ideal study system for understanding adaptation to leaf-eating. Most folivorous lemurs are also highly endangered. The significance of folivory for conservation outlook is complex. Though generalist folivores may be relatively well equipped to survive habitat disturbance, specialist folivores occupying narrow dietary niches may be less resilient. Characterizing the genetic bases of adaptation to folivory across species and lineages can provide insights into their differential physiology and potential to resist habitat change. We recently reported accelerated genetic change in RNASE1, a gene encoding an enzyme (RNase 1) involved in molecular adaptation in mammalian folivores, including various monkeys and sifakas (genus Propithecus; family Indriidae). Here, we sought to assess whether other lemurs, including phylogenetically and ecologically diverse folivores, might show parallel adaptive change in RNASE1 that could underlie a capacity for efficient folivory. We characterized RNASE1 in 21 lemur species representing all five families and members of the three extant folivorous lineages: (1) bamboo lemurs (family Lemuridae), (2) sportive lemurs (family Lepilemuridae), and (3) indriids (family Indriidae). We found pervasive sequence change in RNASE1 across all indriids, a dN/dS value > 3 in this clade, and evidence for shared change in isoelectric point, indicating altered enzymatic function. Sportive and bamboo lemurs, in contrast, showed more modest sequence change. The greater change in indriids may reflect a shared strategy emphasizing complex gut morphology and microbiota to facilitate folivory. This case study illustrates how genetic analysis may reveal differences in functional traits that could influence species’ ecology and, in turn, their resilience to habitat change. Moreover, our results support the body of work demonstrating that not all primate folivores are built the same and reiterate the need to avoid generalizations about dietary guild in considering conservation outlook, particularly in lemurs where such diversity in folivory has probably led to extensive specialization via niche partitioning.

Highlights

  • The primates of Madagascar include a remarkable number of folivores (Fleagle and Reed, 1996)

  • We uncovered no evidence of a duplication of the RNASE1 gene in bamboo lemurs, sportive lemurs, or indriids

  • The substitution occurring at residue 39 involves a change from a basic to non-basic amino acid, as in colobines and howler monkeys (R > S in indriids; R > W in colobines and howler monkeys; Figure 2; Janiak et al, 2019; Zhang et al, 2002), and is among the substitutions found to be most critical to altering enzymatic activity (Zhou et al, 2014)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The primates of Madagascar include a remarkable number of folivores (Fleagle and Reed, 1996). Madagascar was home to several larger bodied, extinct, “subfossil” lineages that were likely characterized by folivory, including the “sloth lemurs” (family: Paleopropithecidae) and the koala lemurs (genus: Megaladapis) (Yoder, 1999; Fleagle, 2013; Kistler et al, 2015; Marciniak et al, 2021). It is difficult to estimate the number of times that folivory evolved independently in lemurs with confidence, especially given challenges to reconstructing the phylogenetic relationships among lemur families (Horvath et al, 2008; Perelman et al, 2011; McLain et al, 2012; Springer et al, 2012; Herrera and Dávalos, 2016), likely due to a series of ancient rapid divergences resulting in incomplete lineage sorting (Horvath et al, 2008; Marciniak et al, 2021). Nutritional reliance on leaves, which contain plant structural carbohydrates and chemical defenses, is a challenging nutritional strategy (Feeny, 1969; Milton, 1999) and requires numerous anatomical, physiological, and behavioral adaptations (Hladik, 1978)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call