MOLAR AND MOLECULAR CONTROL IN VARIABLE‐INTERVAL AND VARIABLE‐RATIO SCHEDULES

Abstract

Response rates are typically higher under variable‐ratio than under variable‐interval schedules of reinforcement, perhaps because of differences in the dependence of reinforcement rate on response rate or because of differences in the reinforcement of long interresponse times. A variable‐interval‐with‐added‐linear‐feedback schedule is a variable‐interval schedule that provides a response rate/reinforcement rate correlation by permitting the minimum interfood interval to decrease with rapid responding. Four rats were exposed to variable‐ratio 15, 30, and 60 food reinforcement schedules, variable‐interval 15‐, 30‐, and 60‐s food reinforcement schedules, and two versions of variable‐interval‐with‐added‐linear‐feedback 15‐, 30‐, and 60‐s food reinforcement schedules. Response rates on the variable‐interval‐with‐added‐linear‐feedback schedule were similar to those on the variable‐interval schedule; all three schedules led to lower response rates than those on the variable‐ratio schedules, especially when the schedule values were 30. Also, reinforced interresponse times on the variable‐interval‐with‐added‐linear‐feedback schedule were similar to those on variable interval and much longer than those produced by variable ratio. The results were interpreted as supporting the hypothesis that response rates on variable‐interval schedules in rats are lower than those on comparable variable‐ratio schedules, primarily because the former schedules reinforce long interresponse times.