Abstract

The modulation of the binding of muscarinic cholinergic receptor ligands by phosphatidylserine purified from bovine cerebral cortex (BC-PS) was examined in vitro and in vivo. The enrichment of bovine cerebral cortical synaptosomal membranes with BC-PS, using a fusion technique, produced a concentration-dependent decrease in the affinity (increase in Kd) of [3H]quinuclidinyl benzylate (3H-QNB) specific binding to muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChR), without changes in their maximal number (Bmax). Similar results were observed when [3H]oxotremorine (3H-OXO) was used to label a high affinity subpopulation of mAChR. On the other hand, preincubation of BC-PS liposomes with synaptosomal membranes in a nonoptimum fusion condition (at pH 7.4) did not alter the binding properties of both radioligands. Fusion experiments using a pure phosphatidylserine preparation from spinal cord revealed a similar decrement in the affinity of 3H-QNB specific binding. Five day's intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of 15 mg/kg of BC-PS liposomes in rats increased the maximal number of cerebral cortical binding sites for 3H-OXO. Scatchard analysis revealed no changes in the apparent dissociation constant. This modification is selective in relation to the neural structure studied. Thus, BC-PS treatment did not modify 3H-OXO binding in the hippocampal formation and cerebellum. In contrast, parallel experiments using the muscarinic antagonist 3H-QNB showed no alteration in the binding properties of mAChR. Five day's i.p. administration of 15 mg/kg/d of phosphatidylcholine from bovine cerebral cortex (BC-PC) liposomes produced quite similar results to those obtained with BC-PS. These results indicate that mAChR are under the modulatory action of phosphatidylserine (PS) and phosphatidylcholine (PC), and suggest that this endogenous phospholipids may play a regulatory role on the mAChR. The possible implications of these findings on the effects of PC or PS treatment in neurological disorders involving a decrease in central cholinergic functions are discussed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call