Abstract

The antitumor action of propolis is of clinical interest because of the need for new anticancer treatment agents. The present investigation intended to extract and assess the chemical content, cytotoxic action, the growth inhibitory activity and anticancer capability of Egyptian propolis versus Chinese propolis. This was carried out using water extract (WE) and ethanolic extract (EE) on the human hepatocellular carcinoma (HEp-2) cell line and the loss of heterozygosity (LOH) assay of Drosophila melanogaster somatic cells against the direct genotoxicity of doxorubicin. EPWE, EPEE, CPWE and CPEE extracts analyzed by HPLC showed that there were sensible and various concentrations of phenolic compounds in both. Total phenolics were determined to be 18.83, 34.87, 39.29 and 180.89 g-1 by using EPWE, CPWE, EPEE and CPEE extracts, respectively. Chinese propolis ethanol extract (CPEE) have major concentrations of total phenolics and phenolic acids and contained high concentrations of rutin (188.90 g/mL). The study of the antiproliferative capacity of propolis extractors against HEp-2 cancer cell lines showed that all the studied propolis extracts induce suppression of cell growth except CPWE extract; it gave 100% cell viability. The great majority of the propolis are strongly cytotoxic against HEp-2 cell line with 500 μg/ml CPEE. Also, PEE is the most effective in inhibition of HEp-2 cell proliferation compared to PWE. In Drosophila assay, treatment with propolis extract and DOX carcinogenic agent led to a reduction in the frequency of recombination compared to the treatment with DOX alone either in the post- and pre-treatments. In general, PEE exhibited powerful anti-proliferative effects than PWE. The ethanol extract provided the highest protection against Doxorubicin (DOR) induced genotoxicity, a fact that supports their anti-cancer activity. The results demonstrate that PEE is a good source of a natural antitumor operator able to inhibit cancer cell proliferation.

Highlights

  • MATERIALS AND METHODSTwo samples of propolis were studied, one of them; Egyptian samples that collected in plastic bags from colonies of honeybees located at Faculty of Agriculture, Qalyubi Governorate, Egypt

  • EPWE, EPEE, CPWE and Chinese propolis ethanol extract (CPEE) extracts analyzed by HPLC showed that there were sensible and various concentrations of phenolic compounds in bot

  • The great majority of the propolis are strongly cytotoxic against HEp-2 cell line with 500 μg/ml CPEE

Read more

Summary

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two samples of propolis were studied, one of them; Egyptian samples that collected in plastic bags from colonies of honeybees located at Faculty of Agriculture, Qalyubi Governorate, Egypt. One gram of brown powder of propolis was dissolved in 10 ml distilled water and mixed vigorously for 10 min. The values have been in comparison with control sets, run under identical conditions without the test compound This assay was conducted to identify and characterize the potential tumorigenesis or anti-tumorigenesis of propolis extracts and was scored for loss of LOH on D. melanogaster (Eeken et al, 2002; Nepomuceno, 2015). It has wart (wts) tumor suppressor lethal allele, balanced by TM3 on chromosome 3 This strain was given by Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center of the University of Indiana, USA and Oregon R wild type D. melanogaster stocks according to Eeken et al (2002) and Fly (2008)

Experimental procedures
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
SUMMARY
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call