Abstract

In vitro treatment of crude particulate fractions of male rat ventral prostate and female rat liver with membrane fluidizers (aliphatic alcohols) has been previously reported by us to increase prolactin (PRL) receptor levels, presumably by unmasking cryptic prolactin receptors. The objective of this study was to determine if similar in vitro treatment of purified plasma membrane- and Golgi-rich fractions of male rat prostate and female rat liver with ethanol produced differential effects on prolactin binding in these two subcellular fractions. The degree of fluidization was monitored by a fluorescence polarization method using 1,6-diphenylhexatriene. 125I-PRL specific binding to Golgi-rich fractions of male ventral prostate and femlale liver was approximately 4-fold higher than that observed in plasma membrane-rich fractions. The microviscosity parameter, inversely related to lipid fluidity, was consistently lower in Golgi-rich fractions than that in plasma membrane-rich fractions in both prostate and liver. In vitro ethanol treatment of prostatic and hepatic plasma membrane fractions produced a dose-related increase and then decline in prolactin binding and a maximal (60–75%) increase in prolactin binding was observed at 4.8% and 2.0% ethanol in prostatic and hepatic membranes, respectively. This in vitro treatment also produced a significant increase in apparent lipid fluidity of plasma membrane-rich fractions of prostate gland and liver. However, similar in vitro ethanol treatment of Golgi fractions of both prostate gland and liver exhibited little increase in prolactin binding without changing microviscosity. Our observations are consistent with the direct relationship between membrane fluidity and prolactin receptor levels. The changes in prostatic and hepatic plasma membrane fractions following in vitro ethanol treatment suggest that prolactin receptors located on the plasma membranes may be modulated (via membrane lipid microviscosity changes) in vitro to a greater extent by various physiological agents than those located within the Golgi fraction.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.