Abstract

It has been postulated recently that the cerebellum contributes the same prediction and learning functions to linguistic processing as it does towards motor control. For example, repetitive TMS over posterior-lateral cerebellum caused a significant loss in predictive language processing, as assessed by the latency of saccades to target items of spoken sentences, using the Visual World task. We aimed to assess the polarity-specific effects of cerebellar TDCS, hypothesising that cathodal TDCS should impair linguistic prediction, and anodal TDCS facilitate it. Our design also tested whether TDCS modulated associative learning in this task. A between groups (sham, anodal, cathodal) design was used, with concurrent stimulation during performance of a manual variation of the Visual World paradigm, and with assessment of latency reduction over repeated presentations of the spoken sentences. Mixed model ANOVA was used to analyse change in response latency. Cathodal TDCS decreased participants’ response time advantage for the predictable sentence items without change for non-predictable items, consistent with the previous TMS results. Furthermore, anodal stimulation enhanced the response time advantage for the predictable items, again without change in latencies for non-predictive items. We found a clear practice-based effect over 4 blocks. However, this difference was not significantly modulated by either anodal or cathodal stimulation. Our results therefore support the hypothesis that cerebellum contributes to predictive language processing, mirroring its predictive role in motor control, but we do not yet have evidence that the learning process was affected by cerebellar TDCS.

Highlights

  • It has been postulated recently that the cerebellum contributes the same prediction and learning functions to linguistic processing as it does towards motor control

  • Consistent with the previously reported effects of repetitive TMS over the right lateral cerebellum (Lesage et al, 2012), cathodal stimulation over the right cerebellum appeared to degrade the predictive advantage in response latency for trials with specific verb sentences, while having no influence on responses to general verb sentences

  • Anodal TDCS facilitated responses in the predictive trials, such that by Block 5 there was a 124 ms mean difference in predictive advantage between the anodal and cathodal groups, while the sham group showed an intermediate level of performance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It has been postulated recently that the cerebellum contributes the same prediction and learning functions to linguistic processing as it does towards motor control. Lesage et al (2012) used the Visual World Paradigm to monitor language processing through eye movements (Huettig et al, 2011) and tested the effects of cerebellar disruption with repetitive TMS. They found that low frequency rTMS over the right cerebellum increased the latency of saccades towards target images but only in conditions where a spoken verb predicted a specific target, consistent with disruption of linguistic prediction

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.