Abstract
The coupled substitution between Na+Si and Ca+Al in the plagioclase solid solution results in a continuous variation in the Al/Si ratio of the composition, which is the reason for the complicated ordering patterns in the intermediate plagioclase feldspars like labradorite. Both fast-cooled and slow-cooled labradorite feldspars display the incommensurately modulated structures. The ordering pattern in the incommensurately modulated structures of e-plagioclase (characterized by the satellite diffraction peak called e-reflections) is the most complicated and intriguing. The modulated structure has a superspace group symmetry of X(αβγ)0 with a special centering condition of (½ ½ ½ 0), (0 0 ½ ½), (½ ½ 0 ½), and the q-vector has components (i.e., δh, δk, δl) along all three axes in reciprocal space. Displacive modulation, occupational modulation, and density modulation are observed in slowly cooled labradorite feldspars. No density modulation was observed in fast cooled (volcanic) labradorite feldspars. The amplitudes of the modulation waves are new parameters for quantifying the ordering state of labradorite. Iridescent labradorite feldspars display exsolution lamellae with average periodicity ranging from ~ 150 nm to ~350 nm. Compositional difference between the lamellae is about 12 mole % in anorthite component. Areas or zones with red iridescent color (i.e., long lamellae periodicity) always contain more Ca (~ 1 to 3 mole %) than the areas with blue (or green) iridescent color within the same labradorite crystal. We proposed that the solvus for Bøggild intergrowth has a loop-like shape ranging from ~An44 to ~ An63. The Ca-rich side has higher temperature than the Na-rich side. The shapes of satellite peaks, the distances between e-reflections (modulation periods), and even the intensity of c-reflections may also be used to evaluate the ordering state or cooling rate of the plagioclase feldspar. Both modulated structure and the exsolution lamellae can be used as proxies for quantifying cooling rate of a labradorite and its host rock.
Highlights
Very different models (Jogodzinski group, 1981; Yamomoto and Morimoto group, Megaw, McConnell, 1984 ) were proposed based on exact same Bailey’s group, set of data
Smith & Brown (1988) described the problem quite well: “It must be stated that quite frankly, each group of scientists has produced an impressive set of data and conclusions, there has been no comprehensive attempt to make comparative tests in the true spirit of scientific inquiry
Has been described! The hunters must set up a joint safari, and collect new data at low temperature on specimens which span the entire composition range of e‐plagioclase.”
Summary
Very different models (Jogodzinski group, 1981; Yamomoto and Morimoto group, Megaw, McConnell, 1984 ) were proposed based on exact same Bailey’s group, set of data. Modulated structures and subsolidus phase relations of Labradorite Feldspars University of Wisconsin ‐ Madison Department of Geoscience The 2nd International Electronic Conference on Mineral Science 01/03/2021 ‐ 15/03/2021
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.