Abstract

We analyse the Weak Gravity Conjecture for chiral four-dimensional F-theory compactifications with N = 1 supersymmetry. Extending our previous work on nearly tensionless heterotic strings in six dimensions, we show that under certain assumptions a tower of asymptotically massless states arises in the limit of vanishing coupling of a U(1) gauge symmetry coupled to gravity. This tower contains super-extremal states whose charge-to-mass ratios are larger than those of certain extremal dilatonic Reissner-Nordström black holes, precisely as required by the Weak Gravity Conjecture. Unlike in six dimensions, the tower of super-extremal states does not always populate a charge sub-lattice.The main tool for our analysis is the elliptic genus of the emergent heterotic string in the chiral N = 1 supersymmetric effective theories. This also governs situations where the heterotic string is non-perturbative. We show how it can be computed in terms of BPS invariants on elliptic four-folds, by making use of various dualities and mirror symmetry. Compared to six dimensions, the geometry of the relevant elliptically fibered four-folds is substantially richer than that of the three-folds, and we classify the possibilities for obtaining critical, nearly tensionless heterotic strings. We find that the (quasi-)modular properties of the elliptic genus crucially depend on the choice of flux background. Our general results are illustrated in a detailed example.

Highlights

  • It is one of the celebrated properties of string theory that it relates deep properties of quantum gravity and field theory in dimensions lower than ten to the geometry of the space on which the theory is compactified

  • Extending our previous work on nearly tensionless heterotic strings in six dimensions, we show that under certain assumptions a tower of asymptotically massless states arises in the limit of vanishing coupling of a U(1) gauge symmetry coupled to gravity

  • String compactifications offer an outstanding opportunity to test these conjectures and to uncover the mathematical structures of the compactification space to which they point. Among the earliest such conjectures is the Weak Gravity Conjecture (WGC) [1], which asserts that in any gauge theory coupled to quantum gravity there should exist some set of particles whose charge-to-mass ratio exceeds that of an extremal black hole

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is one of the celebrated properties of string theory that it relates deep properties of quantum gravity and field theory in dimensions lower than ten to the geometry of the space on which the theory is compactified. Both terms necessarily appear at one-loop order, if the elliptic genus is (quasi-)modular and non-zero In this case the Stuckelberg mass is parametrically smaller than the Kaluza-Klein scale in the asymptotic weak coupling limit, and for the purpose of discussing the Weak Gravity Conjecture, we can consider the U(1) gauge field as effectively being massless. The relation to the Weak Gravity Conjecture is analysed in section 6: after showing that — modulo the caveats above — the weak coupling limit gives rise to an asymptotically tensionless, critical heterotic string, we use the (quasi-)modularity properties of its elliptic genus to prove the Weak Gravity Conjecture whenever a limit of this type is available.

From mirror symmetry to the elliptic genus
Mirror symmetry with fluxes and the free energy
General properties of the 4d elliptic genus
Elliptic genera from four-folds with flux
Quasi-perturbative heterotic strings from wrapped D3-branes
Elliptic genus and Gromov-Witten invariants of four-folds
Aspects of F-theory - heterotic duality in four dimensions
F-theory on P1 fibrations
Generalisation
Weak gravity conjectures in four dimensions
The non-trivial cycle
The normal bundle of the shrinking curve Cν0 takes the form
Compatibility of the weak coupling limit with D-terms
WGC bounds: elliptic genus versus supergravity
Stuckelberg masses and the Weak Gravity Conjecture
Conclusions and outlook
A Jacobi forms
B Details of the four-fold Y4 discussed in section 5
C Weak coupling limits of Class A for another example base B3
D General properties of weak coupling limits
Class A
Class B
E Example of a base B3 admitting both Class A and Class B weak coupling limits
F Example of an emergent critical string in a Class B weak coupling limit
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call