Abstract

Abstract INTRODUCTION Glioblastoma and other intracranial neoplasms have been associated with breakdown of the blood brain barrier. Other protective CNS barriers have sparsely been studied in brain tumors. Here, we identify the ability of intracranial neoplasms to hijack the meningeal venolymphatic network, which is driven through VEGFR-2/VEGF-A signaling. METHODS C57BL/6J mice were stereotactically injected with syngeneic SB28 (glioblastoma) cell lines. Mice were treated with either isotype control or a VEGFR-2 inhibitor. Two-photon microscopy was used to visualize vascular cytoarchitecture and dynamics in vivo. Meningeal whole mounts, brains and spleens were also collected and analyzed by confocal microscopy and high parameter flow cytometry. Similar experiments were conducted with a PECAM-1 inhibitor to assess the role of endothelial cell crosstalk in venolymphatic expansion. Human dura mater from glioblastoma patients underwent multiplex immunohistochemistry to confirm the translatability of our findings. RESULTS Our imaging studies revealed that glioblastomas can generate an extensive de novo network of meningeal blood vessels and lymphatics both in mice and humans. Lymphatic vessels were often observed developing in parallel to the newly formed vasculature. Intravital two-photon microscopy further revealed that the peritumoral vascular bed in the meninges of mice was leaky, dysfunctional, and generated a hypoxic microenvironment. Importantly, inhibition of VEGFR signaling impeded formation of this faulty venolymphatic network, which slowed tumor growth, reduced peritumoral hypoxia, enhanced immune infiltration, and increased survival. PECAM-1 (CD31) inhibition had a similar effect on the tumor microenvironment, suggesting that endothelial cell crosstalk is required for glioblastomas to optimally invade the meninges. CONCLUSION Our results demonstrate that glioblastomas can invade the meninges and hijack the venolymphatic network through VEGFR-2 and PECAM-1 signaling. While VEGFR-2 is associated with angiogenesis, our data suggest that it may also have an important role in regulating the simultaneous development of de novo meningeal venous and lymphatic drainage during glioblastoma.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call