Abstract

AbstractThis think piece suggests that Children's Court Care Plans should include a new section that documents poverty and social disadvantage, especially of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families, when they are under investigation for child abuse and neglect. New South Wales in Australia is used as the exemplar state, but this suggestion may find an echo elsewhere.Points for practitioners As a general proposition social and economic circumstances should be considered in addition to parental dysfunction in child protection proceedings in Children's court. Care Plans prepared for hearings in the NSW Children's Court, often developed in response to serious harm report investigations, currently do not contain information about parents' poverty and social disadvantage and hence decontextualise family living circumstances. Consistent with international evidence, Care Plans should require information about parents' socioeconomic situation, including social disadvantage of residential neighbourhood, status and cost of household tenancy, and household income. Taking account of social and economic circumstances has the potential to generate savings in out‐of‐home care that can be re‐allocated to support services to reduce poverty and social disadvantage and thereby reduce the need for removal of children from parental care.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call