Abstract

Weights of evidence (WofE) and logistic regression (LR) are two loglinear methods for mineral potential mapping. Both models are limited by their respective basic assumptions in application. Ideally, WofE indicator patterns have the property of conditional independence (CI) with respect to the point pattern of mineral deposits to be predicted; in LR, there supposedly are no interactions between the point pattern and two or more of the indicator patterns. If the CI assumption is satisfied, estimated LR coefficients become approximately equal to WofE contrasts and the two methods produce similar results; additionally, bias then is avoided in that the sum of all estimated posterior probabilities becomes approximately equal to the number of observed discrete events. WofE allows construction of input layers that have missing data as a separate category in addition to known presence-absence type input, while logistic regression as such is not capable of handling missing data. As an improved WofE model based on LR, modified weights of evidence (MWofE) inherit the advantages of both LR and WofE, i.e., eliminates bias due to lack of CI and can handle missing data as well. Pixel or unit area input for MWofE consists of positive and negative weights for presence and absence of a pattern plus zeros for missing data. MWofE first is illustrated by application to simple examples. Next, it is applied to a study area with 20 known gold occurrences in southwestern Nova Scotia in relation to four input layers based on geological and lake geochemical data. Assuming that geochemical data were missing for the northern part of the study area, MWofE, like WofE but unlike LR, provides posterior probabilities for the entire area.

Highlights

  • Introductions to basic principles of weights of evidence (WofE) can be found in Agterberg [1], Bonham-Carter et al [2], and Bonham-Carter [3]

  • As a powerful tool to deal with missing data, WofE was used to develop a spatially weighted logistic regression model for mineral prospectivity mapping [7]

  • WofE, modified weights of evidence (MWofE) can cope with missing data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Introductions to basic principles of weights of evidence (WofE) can be found in Agterberg [1], Bonham-Carter et al [2], and Bonham-Carter [3]. When there are relatively few point events, LR is likely to produce smaller variances of the coefficients than WofE contrasts provided that the map patterns are nearly conditionally independent This is because WofE variances of weights and contrasts are based on an assumption of asymptotic normality of maximum likelihood estimators [38], a condition that is unlikely to be satisfied when the number of observed point events is relatively small. [11] related a gold deposit pattern in Nova Scotia to seven map patterns that were approximately conditionally independent of the point pattern In this situation, the resulting logistic regression coefficients were close to the WofE contrasts ([11], Table 1). This subject will be discussed in the remainder of this paper

Why Modified Weights of Evidence Is
Lack of Constancy of Statistical Parameters in
Map Patterns with Missing Data
Concluding Remarks
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call