Abstract
ABSTRACT The Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (MCTQ) has been widely validated among various types of populations. However, determination of chronotype among individuals who have a split sleep pattern with short intervals between the first and second sleep bouts on free days has not yet been reported. This study aimed to validate the MCTQ modified for this purpose by assessing the actual sleep-wake timing against the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ). The modified calculation for the midpoint of sleep on free days (MSF) of the split sleep pattern considers the second sleep bout as the total sleep duration on free days. We recruited 161 participants (mean age: 38.7 ± 7.8 years; 73% females, 29% with split sleep pattern) were recruited to administer the modified version of the MCTQ and MEQ. All of the MCTQ original parameters: midpoint of sleep on work days (MSW, r = −0.575), midpoint of sleep on free days (MSF, r = −0.568), and midpoint of sleep on free days corrected for sleep debt (MSFsc,r = −0.566) were significantly correlated with MEQ. The MEQ was further tested against MSF in four conditions of the split sleep pattern. The MSF modified for split sleep within 60 minutes after the first awakening showed highest correlation (r = −0.576) against MEQ score. The results demonstrate the modified version of MCTQ is valid to determine the chronotype in participants who practice consolidated and split sleep patterns.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.