Abstract

BackgroundThis study aimed to compare the operative outcome of percutaneous repair (modified Bunnell suture technique) versus open repair (bundle-to-bundle suture technique) of acute Achilles tendon rupture.MethodsSeventy-two consecutive patients who underwent surgical treatment of Achilles tendon rupture were evaluated in this prospective study. Thirty-six patients were treated using the bundle-to-bundle suture technique (group A), and 36 patients were treated using the modified Bunnell suture technique (group B). All patients underwent functional examination comprising measurement of the calf muscle circumference and performance of the single-leg heel-rise test. The length and diameter of the Achilles tendon were compared between the injured and uninjured sides on magnetic resonance imaging. The number of single-leg heel rises (height > 5 cm) performed within 15 s was compared between the injured and uninjured sides. The ankle range of motion was also recorded. The Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale score, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score were used to evaluate the clinical outcome at 12 months postoperatively.ResultsA total of 61 patients were followed up. The mean follow-up duration did not significantly differ between group A (23.73 ± 2.81 months) and group B (22.61 ± 3.96 months). However, there were significant differences between groups in the heel-rise test (group A, 1.74 ± 0.96; group B, 2.37 ± 1.42) and length of the Achilles tendon (group A, 11.98 ± 1.64 cm; group B, 11.11 ± 1.74 cm). The calf circumference of the injured side was significantly larger in group A than in group B (p = 0.043). The cross-sectional diameter of the Achilles tendon was significantly smaller in group A than group B. At final follow-up, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the ATRS, AOFAS score, or VAS score. One patient in group A had delayed wound healing, which resolved in 40 days.ConclusionsPatients with acute Achilles tendon rupture treated with open repair (bundle-to-bundle suture technique) achieved a better clinical outcome regarding the heel-rise test and calf circumference compared with those treated with percutaneous repair (modified Bunnell suture technique).Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000035229, 8/4/2020, Retrospectively registered.

Highlights

  • This study aimed to compare the operative outcome of percutaneous repair versus open repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture

  • Patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture treated with open repair achieved a better clinical outcome regarding the heel-rise test and calf circumference compared with those treated with percutaneous repair

  • There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, sex, or body mass index (BMI)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This study aimed to compare the operative outcome of percutaneous repair (modified Bunnell suture technique) versus open repair (bundle-to-bundle suture technique) of acute Achilles tendon rupture. Many Achilles tendon repair techniques have been described. Achilles tendon rupture is treated using nonoperative treatment, open repair, percutaneous repair, or minimally invasive repair techniques [4,5,6,7]. Percutaneous repair of Achilles tendon rupture reportedly reduces the destruction of the blood supply and lowers the risk of wound complications and infections [11]. The bundle-tobundle suture technique is a type of open repair that minimizes the loss of Achilles tendon length and restores good ankle function [7, 12, 13]. The closure and restoration of the paratenon and fascia cruris aims to optimize blood flow to the repaired Achilles tendon [14]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call