Abstract

BackgroundSurgery is the preferred treatment for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (STAAD); however, due to the complexity of the procedure, cardiac ischaemia and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time are longer than general heart surgery, leading to complications. In this present study, we used an integrated tetra-furcate graft for both modified aortic root and distal arch anastomoses (frozen elephant trunk technique, [FET]), and investigated postoperative outcomes associated with this technique in patients with STAAD. MethodsWe included a total of 140 patients who underwent total arch replacement and FET between January 2019 and June 2022 in the present study, 41 patients who underwent the modified technique, and 99 who underwent the graft eversion technique. We subsequently analyzed the perioperative outcomes to compare the differences between the two techniques. ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in regards to the preoperative characteristics; however, the intraoperative CPB, cardiac ischaemia, and operation times of the modified technique group were significantly shorter than those of the eversion technique group (P = 0.02, P = 0.01, and P = 0.04, respectively), as were postoperative hypoxaemia, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and ventilation times (P = 0.04, P = 0.03, and P = 0.04, respectively). Additionally, the degree of postoperative bilirubin elevation was milder in the modified technique group (P = 0.002 for direct bilirubin and P = 0.01 for indirect bilirubin). ConclusionsThe modified anastomosis technique can significantly shorten CPB, cardiac ischemia, and operation times, and reduce the intraoperative FFP transfusion and postoperative hypoxemia times. This modified technique, therefore, is worth utilizing for patients with STAAD.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call