Abstract

Background: In order to minimise transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing COVID-19, delivery of English general practice consultations was modified in March 2020 to enable the separation of patients with diagnosed or suspected COVID-19 from others. Remote triage and consultations became the default, with adapted face-to-face contact used only when clinically necessary. Face-to-face delivery modifications were decided locally and this study aimed to identify the different models used nationwide in spring/summer 2020. Methods: In June 2020, a survey was sent by email to the 135 Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) responsible for planning and commissioning NHS health care services in England to identify the local organisation of face-to-face general practice consultations since March 2020. Results: All CCGs responded. Between March and July 2020, separation of patients with diagnosed or suspected COVID-19 ('COVID-19 patients') from others was achieved using the following models: zoned practices(usedwithin47% of CCGs), where COVID-19 and other patients were separated within their own practice;'hot' or 'cold' hubs (used within 90% of CCGs), separate sites where COVID-19 or other patients registered at one of several collaborating practices were seen;'hot' and 'cold' home visits (used within 70% of CCGs). For around half of CCGs, either all their GP practices used zoning, or all used hubs; in other CCGs, both models were used. Demand-led hub availability offered flexibility in some areas.Home visits were mainly used supplementally for patients unable to access other services, but in two CCGs, they were the main/only form of COVID-19 provision. Conclusions: Varied, flexible ways of delivering face-to-face general practice consultations were identified. Analysis of the modified delivery in terms of management of COVID-19 and other conditions, and other impacts on staff and patients, may both aid future pandemic management and identify beneficial elements for practice beyond this.

Highlights

  • In March 2020 it was estimated that more than 80% of patients with COVID-19 would not require hospitalisation,[1] and it was likely that many would seek treatment in general practice

  • Replies were received from all Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs), 99% by 31st July 2020, with the final response received on 2nd October 2020

  • Complete response sets, were used, together with internet searches and further CCG contacts, to interpret and categorise all face-to-face consultation types according to the models in this report

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In March 2020 it was estimated that more than 80% of patients with COVID-19 would not require hospitalisation,[1] and it was likely that many would seek treatment in general practice. In order to minimise transmission of the causative severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) during general practice (GP) consultations, NHS England’s Standard Operating Procedure was revised in March 2020 to a remote triage and consultation default, with adapted models for face-to-face contact used only when clinically necessary.[2] The use of telephone, video and online consultations in English general practice has been studied elsewhere.[3] In this paper we report on the delivery of face-toface general practice consultations across England during the first wave of the pandemic, in spring/summer 2020. The need to separate patients with diagnosed or suspected COVID-19 [‘COVID-19’ patients] from others to minimise cross-infection during clinically necessary face-to-face consultations was evident. In order to minimise transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing COVID-19, delivery of English general practice consultations was modified in March 2020 to enable the separation of patients with diagnosed or suspected COVID-19 from others. Between March and July 2020, separation of patients with diagnosed or suspected COVID-19 (‘COVID19 patients’) from others was achieved using the following models: 1. zoned practices (used within 47% of CCGs), where COVID-19 and other patients were separated within their own practice; 2. ‘hot’ or ‘cold’ hubs (used within 90% of CCGs), separate sites where COVID-19 or other patients registered at one of several collaborating practices were seen; 3. ‘hot’ and ‘cold’ home visits (used within 70% of CCGs)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call