Abstract

The wall-modeled large-eddy simulation branch of the widely used improved delayed detached-eddy simulation (IDDES) method is supposed to resolve the problems of log-layer mismatch and underprediction of skin friction, as claimed by the authors of the IDDES (Shur, M. L., Spalart, P. R., Strelets, M. K., and Travin, A. K., "A Hybrid RANS-LES Model with Delayed DES and Wall-Modeled LES Capabilities," International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, Vol. 29, 2008, pp. 1638–1649). But, some researchers did meet these problems when using the IDDES. Aiming at finding out the reason and seeking a remedy, an analysis of the IDDES is carried out that focuses on the relation between the wall-parallel grid size and the length scale of the energetic turbulent structures at the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS)/large-eddy simulation (LES) interface, and it reveals that the flaw of the IDDES arises from the fact that, in the IDDES approach, the energetic, large-scale, and stress-carrying turbulent structures in the vicinity of the RANS/LES interface are essentially impossible to well resolve by the LES mode. On the basis of the analysis, a modification to the IDDES is proposed by moving the RANS/LES interface further away from the wall so that, at the RANS/LES interface, the wall-parallel grid size is sufficient to resolve the turbulent structures. The modification is simple in form but has clear physical meaning. Through a series of sensitivity tests, it can be concluded that the modified IDDES does resolve the problems of log-layer mismatch and underprediction of skin friction, and it is applicable to low-, moderate-, and high-Reynolds-number flat plate boundary-layer flows without exception.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call